{"id":"W2144457452","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00307.x","title":"Rethinking biodiversity: from goods and services to “living with”","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":257,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Biodiversity; Convention on Biological Diversity; Commodification; Ecosystem services; Diversity (politics); Goods and services; Environmental resource management; Currency; Business; Ecosystem; Economics; Ecology; Political science; Biology; Law; Economy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001609234,0.00009953314,0.00007016322,0.00002922757,0.0001547707,0.00004489958,0.0001024691,0.00002466158,0.000710416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006810528,0.00009565929,0.00001203832,0.0001251154,0.00007295743,0.0005351432,0.0002372665,0.00005249132,0.000396853],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007946808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":8.519717e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001674906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005143359,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992977,0.00003672535,0.00009613593,0.000195071,0.000194358,0.0001799866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996263,0.00005810802,0.00005294196,0.0001486784,0.000001668706,0.000112339],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005281585,0.0000139182,0.9766779,0.000005165992,0.00001033168,8.331906e-7,0.002422093,0.00005502042,0.01326782,0.00004108407,0.00704189,0.0004586387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001219871,0.00001184584,0.9571935,0.00002109051,0.00001762977,8.198892e-7,0.0003222128,0.0001162217,0.0002694946,0.0000184188,0.04176833,0.0001384556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9684131,0.00001707863,0.001830735,0.02889815,0.00006676069,0.0001536843,0.000003974483,0.00004717261,0.0005692993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8654656,0.000004027818,0.007700662,0.1266861,0.00002075891,0.000009148376,0.00001365312,0.000005848251,0.00009420984],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1029475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7778558,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01400801105052014,"score_gpt":0.1885837637100984,"score_spread":0.1745757526595782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}