{"id":"W2144478018","doi":"10.1155/2012/510920","title":"Visual and Chemical Prey Cues as Complementary Predator Attractants in a Tropical Stream Fish Assemblage","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Zoology","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; Concordia University","keywords":"Predation; Foraging; Predator; Attraction; Sensory cue; Biology; Ecology; Attractiveness; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001356521,0.00006627443,0.0001259086,0.00002286098,0.00001952656,0.00001752153,0.0001420328,0.00006491521,0.0003783576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006117175,0.00002847866,0.00004551542,0.00003866677,0.00005204696,0.0002331038,0.00006000397,0.0001496854,0.000005247585],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003787656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006841947,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005992453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001211979,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992538,0.00005311257,0.0002648442,0.00009897749,0.0001904272,0.0001388259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996279,0.00007368936,0.0001250987,0.00001333052,0.00008368005,0.00007633768],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001741317,0.0002837137,0.7673473,6.940052e-7,0.00001827441,0.00002012786,0.00005332097,1.247738e-7,0.2190961,0.00005906001,0.0001683743,0.01277875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002448838,0.0003185493,0.9875388,0.00001073958,0.00001012788,0.0005742464,0.0001852032,0.000003621985,0.009862,0.0001142079,0.001083371,0.00005421404],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975539,0.00009673581,0.000001742954,0.001785494,0.0004205148,0.00004250576,0.00001145818,0.000004859364,0.00008278462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987278,0.00005841656,0.00006672442,0.0001669796,0.000942428,0.000001236717,0.00001502117,6.14166e-7,0.00002075813],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2201915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.414275,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02795661665965535,"score_gpt":0.3108650614144118,"score_spread":0.2829084447547565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}