{"id":"W2144660075","doi":"10.3109/09286586.2014.895843","title":"Is it time to move beyond the QALY in vision research?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Ophthalmic Epidemiology","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Willingness to pay; Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; Quality-adjusted life year; Cost effectiveness; Economic evaluation; Intervention (counseling); Unit (ring theory); Metric (unit); Cost–benefit analysis; Diabetic retinopathy; Actuarial science; Optometry; Family medicine; Operations management; Nursing; Diabetes mellitus; Risk analysis (engineering)","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2099583,0.0005711351,0.004029046,0.001334253,0.0003802138,0.00007392201,0.001952372,0.002321384,0.005090729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1889112,0.0005729147,0.0003714219,0.0006027145,0.0003911305,0.0002241723,0.0005603437,0.002764902,0.1029348],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001866683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006041632,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004588047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001556859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9758612,0.009410495,0.0101791,0.002326105,0.0003436133,0.001879517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.899475,0.09316424,0.003997535,0.002542537,0.0003350452,0.0004856286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003649753,0.00005098835,0.001242685,0.0002009447,0.00005746512,0.000003907839,0.0008484737,0.0001325848,6.575449e-7,0.00533929,0.9919619,0.0001245927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044361,0.0002525312,0.001957094,0.0002249233,0.000005568585,0.00000723009,0.0001323149,0.002015481,2.922319e-7,0.06668222,0.9277997,0.0004790247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.00289492,0.004882993,0.0002729541,0.4202293,0.498438,0.002702246,0.001860659,0.00005314218,0.06866586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001940875,0.0009066187,0.002244581,0.08782029,0.8272316,0.001143338,0.0009343497,0.0002981509,0.07748017],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","teacher_disagreement_score":0.332409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5081735968435178,"score_gpt":0.564224583759846,"score_spread":0.05605098691632815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}