{"id":"W2144660075","doi":"10.3109/09286586.2014.895843","title":"Is it time to move beyond the QALY in vision research?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Ophthalmic Epidemiology","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Willingness to pay; Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; Quality-adjusted life year; Cost effectiveness; Economic evaluation; Intervention (counseling); Unit (ring theory); Metric (unit); Cost–benefit analysis; Diabetic retinopathy; Actuarial science; Optometry; Family medicine; Operations management; Nursing; Diabetes mellitus; Risk analysis (engineering)","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.309826,0.003294091,0.01029255,0.005763145,0.002816149,0.01560751,0.009708678,0.01498098,0.03006081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.561698,0.001999655,0.004771426,0.01065242,0.015145,0.04844015,0.01082876,0.02773455,0.008273796],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01826217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02710942,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01591464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01397705,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7531868,0.2048327,0.009783975,0.006870031,0.02294933,0.002377103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3420876,0.576443,0.01321131,0.01864967,0.04138976,0.008218636],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002149726,0.0002838884,0.001484556,0.009066226,0.001555889,0.00009463014,0.0009903795,0.003702481,0.0001415228,0.2224565,0.2702115,0.4878628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008478556,0.0007504568,0.001615613,0.0226406,0.0007100088,0.000173706,0.0008490095,0.003227065,0.0002138651,0.7480614,0.2205901,0.0003203482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008552969,0.2229268,0.03488443,0.7075244,0.02465837,0.0002843718,0.0009370067,0.0002635412,0.007665903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06380092,0.2715977,0.1279043,0.4463681,0.07969031,0.003908514,0.001527995,0.001181981,0.004020321],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.309826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8511074,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5081735968435178,"score_gpt":0.564224583759846,"score_spread":0.05605098691632815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}