{"id":"W2144777282","doi":"10.1139/f09-106","title":"How different is different? Defining management and conservation units for a problematic exploited species","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"National Eye Institute; New York State Department of Environmental Conservation","keywords":"Coregonus clupeaformis; Bay; Endangered species; Fishery; Geography; Coregonus; Ecology; Genetic diversity; Population; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002697999,0.0002201754,0.0004024421,0.002238748,0.004531858,0.002283328,0.001683408,0.0009348886,0.001116519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007286887,0.0002174581,0.0002090056,0.00164724,0.007512511,0.002642012,0.003061933,0.0009003489,0.0001165689],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006355251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007160568,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.124343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3282135,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978409,0.0006936659,0.000160819,0.0003322433,0.0004288118,0.0005435619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969015,0.0003257889,0.001111136,0.0002363802,0.0006077879,0.0008174804],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001815374,0.000165888,0.6322471,0.0002250298,0.0001023008,0.0008493095,0.05003524,0.0005878055,0.006190517,0.0337856,0.004802424,0.2708272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002310773,0.0001725015,0.825595,0.0004292917,0.00009200484,0.0008165247,0.1264704,0.00139368,0.0006926656,0.01915685,0.02508491,0.00007308842],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9628187,0.001679105,0.004364338,0.01309767,0.00009398065,0.0001139172,0.00005558958,0.00002353813,0.01775307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99541,0.0003292177,0.002878208,0.0006293521,0.00002378576,0.00004896195,0.00002852457,0.000008549272,0.0006433739],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.875657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2472385,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03307381133121033,"score_gpt":0.2012160267391925,"score_spread":0.1681422154079821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}