{"id":"W2144787999","doi":"10.5539/mas.v7n12p78","title":"Assessment of Risk of Rainfall Events with a Hybrid of ARFIMA-GARCH","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"Hydrology and Drought Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autoregressive fractionally integrated moving average; Autocorrelation; Persistence (discontinuity); Environmental science; Climatology; Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity; Proxy (statistics); Econometrics; Landslide; Moving average; Series (stratigraphy); Flooding (psychology); Volatility (finance); Mathematics; Statistics; Geology; Long memory","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00317902,0.0007408166,0.0006548136,0.001761257,0.0002535426,0.0009541611,0.0006791163,0.0007845721,0.001259877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004832617,0.0002597911,0.0008565697,0.001128099,0.0002023589,0.001124982,0.0006058192,0.0005180269,0.0001715634],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004640799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004449887,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002794076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002765413,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990164,0.0003550728,0.00008271708,0.0001793757,0.0002598856,0.0001065608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972747,0.001611303,0.0004920751,0.0001969124,0.0003147734,0.0001102234],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006456312,0.000331162,0.31671,0.0001628662,0.001130274,0.0009218495,0.0001678944,0.5967046,0.004790325,0.003544778,0.0009363281,0.07395435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001951602,0.0004190508,0.05889339,0.00001443736,0.0001173328,0.0002272778,0.0001138917,0.9366024,0.00104358,0.002115291,0.0003907145,0.0000431391],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.938048,0.0004312109,0.05843525,0.0001919398,0.00003883303,0.00008039633,0.0006193811,0.0003803036,0.001774765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933296,0.00007650845,0.00584736,0.00001109834,0.00001871904,0.00001851145,0.0003011898,0.00000776029,0.0003892843],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00317902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01681244,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005331988536805703,"score_gpt":0.226967267799162,"score_spread":0.2216352792623563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}