{"id":"W2144791171","doi":"10.1109/mnrc.2008.4683380","title":"Electrostatic energy characterization for an atomic force microscope probe","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Electrostatic force microscope; Electrostatics; Substrate (aquarium); Cantilever; Voltage; Characterization (materials science); Atomic force microscopy; Kelvin probe force microscope; Non-contact atomic force microscopy; Electric field; Electric potential energy; Materials science; Energy (signal processing); Conductive atomic force microscopy; Microscope; Electrostatic discharge; Potential energy; Atomic units; Nanotechnology; Atomic physics; Physics; Optics; Composite material; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004511416,0.0004707364,0.0005536877,0.0005112462,0.0006741809,0.0006153877,0.0009402828,0.001275046,0.002127559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001134843,0.0002745272,0.0003611865,0.0003716417,0.0003611685,0.001384301,0.000494238,0.0006721116,0.0007908263],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009945239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005433554,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001544348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001268013,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995245,0.00002896104,0.0000135608,0.00007381045,0.0003194094,0.00003973449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997407,0.00007288355,0.0000228479,0.00004474131,0.0001070073,0.00001180188],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007576509,0.00008084219,0.001821544,0.0001594084,0.00002618671,0.0003496568,0.0002042883,0.1001247,0.8277969,0.0334067,0.001813788,0.03414029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001006581,0.0001154581,0.001710161,0.00001191629,0.000005713278,0.0001986694,0.00005224892,0.8161841,0.1701709,0.004954085,0.006549229,0.00003736659],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2530825,0.000600387,0.737553,0.0005025674,0.00007400216,0.0001663281,0.0006481308,0.0008479807,0.006525078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8696608,0.0005192657,0.1233044,0.0001254843,0.00002319857,0.0003577792,0.0005495486,0.0001120064,0.005347499],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002127559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007215798,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01117215779216344,"score_gpt":0.2649281768395608,"score_spread":0.2537560190473974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}