{"id":"W2144842029","doi":"10.1109/aps.1989.134610","title":"The application of a simple absorbing boundary algorithm to cylindrical waveguide","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Finite-difference time-domain method; Boundary (topology); Reflection (computer programming); Waveguide; Algorithm; Simple (philosophy); Boundary value problem; Reflection coefficient; Plane (geometry); Domain (mathematical analysis); Grid; Computer science; Mathematics; Optics; Mathematical analysis; Physics; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002303496,0.00006498439,0.00008882748,0.00002693168,0.00006083734,0.00001530624,0.00007546273,0.00003221167,0.00005574706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001153949,0.00004761538,0.00003177534,0.0002617458,0.00001860753,0.00001819191,0.000007921396,0.0000646355,0.00002479744],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002437505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009923683,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001063949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003191164,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994175,0.00003782423,0.0001962272,0.0000837523,0.0001075354,0.000157196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994495,0.0002713838,0.0000136479,0.0001681909,0.00003240024,0.00006489586],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003063418,0.00001509819,0.00006175409,0.000006446694,0.00001401013,2.579436e-7,0.00007125918,0.006395396,0.02096083,0.01104528,0.000681003,0.9607456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001707824,0.00007897294,0.001060473,0.000001951679,0.000006643064,0.0000036712,0.0000418416,0.66241,0.04068599,0.006426493,0.2889846,0.0001286151],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01042601,0.0001419629,0.9583399,0.00008389126,0.00006373783,0.0001451836,5.958734e-7,0.0001003682,0.03069836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7042912,0.00001475399,0.2951876,0.0001572894,0.00003157644,0.00003160792,0.000001513868,0.00001953734,0.0002648832],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.960617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1941699,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00956340972129427,"score_gpt":0.2771379375112791,"score_spread":0.2675745277899849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}