{"id":"W2144853548","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-0064.2012.00436.x","title":"An actor‐network approach to Canadian forest research: The case of a New Brunswick policy debate","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Actor–network theory; Politics; Public policy; Process (computing); Crown (dentistry); Production (economics); Public administration; Sociology; Business; Environmental resource management; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Social science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001413758,0.0004798482,0.0003780844,0.004457841,0.002080252,0.0001940979,0.001521947,0.0002200363,0.0005289134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002017056,0.0004095582,0.0002355248,0.01459417,0.002235105,0.0006512032,0.0001899898,0.0004399595,0.0001799389],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006945243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001070073,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9997581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999878,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942767,0.0002817999,0.0004535592,0.0006085963,0.0003925246,0.003986824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909559,0.0001325433,0.000110945,0.001412438,0.00007630578,0.007311824],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001735916,0.00004152768,0.585705,0.00002347735,0.0001067665,0.0001460192,0.008733434,0.001529791,0.000003078924,0.09007603,0.3066116,0.007005905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002322222,0.0002103088,0.3867098,0.00002487291,0.00005899427,0.0003330524,0.004514139,0.0001166607,0.00000295002,0.002915408,0.6041686,0.0007130226],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9422874,0.000518156,0.000003419769,0.005233566,0.0003772969,0.001101977,0.00009519905,0.00005337714,0.05032963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939576,0.0001825663,0.0004636316,0.002409876,0.0009047328,0.00007310728,0.00006089414,0.00008106459,0.001866574],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2975569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998356,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02780950604239577,"score_gpt":0.2547855566047577,"score_spread":0.2269760505623619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}