{"id":"W2144908804","doi":"10.1139/x06-301","title":"A hierarchical analysis of stand structure, composition, and burn patterns as indicators of stand age in an Engelmann spruce – subalpine fir forest","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Picea engelmannii; Abies lasiocarpa; Montane ecology; Subalpine forest; Forestry; Douglas fir; Altitude (triangle); Geography; Logging; Ecology; Environmental science; Physical geography; Biology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008626617,0.0001326935,0.0002438303,0.0008882271,0.000447881,0.0003329215,0.0001748272,0.0001301766,0.0004586313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001853058,0.0001565119,0.0003315772,0.0006329064,0.000323091,0.0002055632,0.0002695185,0.0001954383,0.00005774993],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007727598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060031,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06496789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1714079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996824,0.0001165,0.0000139258,0.00009209733,0.00003882762,0.00005617558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998329,0.0007347899,0.0003647012,0.0001707367,0.0001885652,0.0002122813],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009449897,0.00002710973,0.9851347,0.00001226148,0.000097036,0.00007010288,0.0003043453,0.001123344,0.004043262,0.00009672759,0.00008072164,0.008915902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002615553,0.00002188368,0.9957048,0.000001712331,0.00002366987,0.00002481416,0.00008623699,0.003783358,0.0001617969,0.00009104316,0.00009458273,0.000003349848],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990945,0.00004440728,0.0006710936,0.000008252454,5.272479e-7,0.000004039276,0.0000801755,0.000009049297,0.00008799731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975091,0.00002336825,0.002109984,0.000004710638,0.000001752814,0.000005889179,0.0002418766,0.00000310106,0.000100093],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06496789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1291794,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01346825062967426,"score_gpt":0.2911831815238181,"score_spread":0.2777149308941438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}