{"id":"W2144951547","doi":"10.1109/csmr.2006.26","title":"Evaluating architectural stability using a metric-based approach","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Metric (unit); Computer science; Architectural pattern; Software architecture; Architecture; Architecture tradeoff analysis method; Stability (learning theory); Set (abstract data type); Software engineering; Software; Software metric; Software evolution; Software system; Reference architecture; Source code; Code (set theory); Software architecture description; Programming language; Software construction; Machine learning; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005994352,0.001164219,0.001022959,0.01123056,0.0007892547,0.002385317,0.001484271,0.001033111,0.001158858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03019372,0.0003607611,0.0006877597,0.005943283,0.0009690135,0.003458013,0.001385018,0.0006886481,0.0003407419],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001670203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009454583,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002674686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002530696,"domain_scores_codex":[0.990932,0.002530415,0.001133825,0.0005645732,0.004635138,0.0002041403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.973306,0.01098812,0.00400079,0.002698063,0.00843659,0.0005704335],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008995706,0.0006386745,0.1286326,0.001012202,0.001075794,0.0004270665,0.001487043,0.2183208,0.06698164,0.02985349,0.002873442,0.5477977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006044157,0.001329921,0.05056046,0.0000930008,0.0002331654,0.0005837488,0.0008198265,0.8947231,0.02774454,0.01783176,0.005805833,0.0002142255],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2853608,0.001052702,0.7037306,0.0003140251,0.0000694074,0.0004419229,0.0009187296,0.002044938,0.006066814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7615605,0.0002266505,0.2361715,0.00003657932,0.00002914557,0.0002760591,0.001022718,0.00009499018,0.0005817711],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01123056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03170151,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1120802288701774,"score_gpt":0.3502005295783329,"score_spread":0.2381203007081555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}