{"id":"W2144978314","doi":"10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.08.040","title":"Synergy and discounting of cooperation in social dilemmas","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Biology","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":359,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute of General Medical Sciences","keywords":"Social dilemma; Pairwise comparison; Discounting; Public good; Evolutionary dynamics; Microeconomics; Dilemma; Prisoner's dilemma; Public goods game; Exploit; Evolutionary game theory; Economics; Mutualism (biology); Game theory; Computer science; Ecology; Biology; Sociology; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Population; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001344803,0.00003823892,0.0001366576,0.0000608691,0.0001154815,0.00000927699,0.00007644821,0.00008606972,0.0002077119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004517654,0.00002950148,0.00002951724,0.00009328085,0.0008630895,0.000140745,0.00001625933,0.0001199159,0.000001494277],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003342849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007038671,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001285895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007584041,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990399,0.0004458122,0.000286548,0.00005108808,0.00007196394,0.000104704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995227,0.0002056413,0.000119321,0.00002172528,0.0001015716,0.00002902085],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007700019,0.00003679187,0.001413305,0.000001546391,0.000005199044,6.346238e-7,0.001636991,0.00002723628,0.003804306,0.9877959,0.00002458503,0.00517654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001241193,0.0006227276,0.006628731,0.00006352125,0.00004060808,0.00002923063,0.00366548,0.0009102329,0.002364014,0.9703674,0.01385099,0.0002159002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849536,0.0001571818,0.001264342,0.006593941,0.00008507197,0.00003367645,0.000001613161,0.000002588808,0.006907983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990191,0.00008316986,0.0002578977,0.00009326941,0.0005127229,5.23134e-7,0.000001099052,0.000001875054,0.00003034384],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01742849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3180089,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01074341535394832,"score_gpt":0.3139200536360752,"score_spread":0.3031766382821269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}