{"id":"W2144978314","doi":"10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.08.040","title":"Synergy and discounting of cooperation in social dilemmas","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Biology","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":359,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute of General Medical Sciences","keywords":"Social dilemma; Pairwise comparison; Discounting; Public good; Evolutionary dynamics; Microeconomics; Dilemma; Prisoner's dilemma; Public goods game; Exploit; Evolutionary game theory; Economics; Mutualism (biology); Game theory; Computer science; Ecology; Biology; Sociology; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Population; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009088575,0.0005900557,0.001276179,0.001128157,0.000633139,0.002905351,0.001271306,0.001867131,0.003660092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04808259,0.0007349786,0.000673008,0.0006340393,0.002956439,0.005377639,0.002011977,0.002540799,0.0001565525],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001323957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009133536,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000655283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000886219,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973235,0.001605906,0.0001701352,0.0002680748,0.0003800958,0.0002523775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9291753,0.05953939,0.004711993,0.002738779,0.00144549,0.002388983],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00107839,0.0002756662,0.009361126,0.0003022497,0.0002488741,0.0006616577,0.001234275,0.07524151,0.003604063,0.8803178,0.0007849123,0.02688944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009971243,0.0001136071,0.003666724,0.00002646524,0.00007489821,0.0002823205,0.0002305813,0.071369,0.0002349289,0.9233572,0.0005026507,0.00004192451],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8942116,0.0009714977,0.08003464,0.001848,0.00009181273,0.00005742794,0.00007345516,0.00004990848,0.02266159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960334,0.0001526203,0.00297542,0.00003011567,0.00003680985,0.00001244152,0.00001022771,0.000006325363,0.0007426688],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009088575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04806554,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01074341535394832,"score_gpt":0.3139200536360752,"score_spread":0.3031766382821269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}