{"id":"W2145141245","doi":"10.1017/s0266462312000013","title":"MATHEMATICAL MODELING: THE CASE OF EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT WAITING TIMES","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","topic":"Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Emergency department; Perspective (graphical); Affect (linguistics); Service (business); Health care; Computer science; Health technology; Medical emergency; Health care delivery; Computed tomography; Operations research; Medicine; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Nursing; Business; Radiology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001963926,0.001460587,0.001467825,0.001580792,0.0003848653,0.001964206,0.002508276,0.002622013,0.004494367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007117482,0.000586471,0.001531965,0.001845706,0.001367078,0.002553542,0.001137399,0.003020968,0.001352142],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001589771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001894914,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005727753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002737271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990129,0.0004673711,0.00007199532,0.0001208283,0.0002517659,0.00007496888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960449,0.002984183,0.0004396139,0.0001140761,0.0003583294,0.00005883623],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005907001,0.0001044582,0.001266382,0.002424779,0.0002206708,0.0007138269,0.0002962652,0.3128768,0.0005785127,0.5721076,0.02635999,0.08299154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003425684,0.00006990635,0.0009101126,0.0009949211,0.000117078,0.0009657845,0.0002181217,0.4444684,0.0004780167,0.4360123,0.1156459,0.00008519281],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.009646246,0.1914553,0.7253415,0.01700731,0.002268774,0.0001573573,0.001022937,0.0003026198,0.05279791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4382817,0.3622865,0.1577831,0.003355362,0.005646571,0.0008835343,0.0009850184,0.0002444754,0.03053364],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005727753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01503515,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1612654168932,"score_gpt":0.5534208995626821,"score_spread":0.3921554826694821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}