{"id":"W2145197630","doi":"10.1016/s0140-6736(01)06714-9","title":"Priority-setting decisions for new cancer drugs: a qualitative case study","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Lancet","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Cancer drugs; Advisory committee; Interview; Resource (disambiguation); Medicine; Business; Public relations; Political science; Cancer; Public administration; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02261112,0.0001777811,0.001028467,0.0001279959,0.0005135611,0.0001202039,0.0004325422,0.00007066765,0.0002173584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005677104,0.0001678568,0.0001174984,0.0002439472,0.00004673682,0.0002654888,0.00006970901,0.0001980551,0.0004502152],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002113495,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01155145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003963415,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961591,0.000560148,0.002213905,0.0004727382,0.00008741171,0.000506706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924237,0.005340698,0.001220579,0.0007825635,0.00007461631,0.000157914],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001626984,0.0003198676,0.05473325,0.0001234316,0.000376733,0.000039663,0.4429529,0.0004703185,0.000001207626,0.04872873,0.444197,0.007894157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00753714,0.0003011959,0.00907254,0.0001620492,0.00005701822,0.000152343,0.3092829,0.005527711,0.000001712924,0.1056912,0.5614412,0.0007729518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8637435,0.002026591,0.009580615,0.1186859,0.0007273394,0.002338869,0.0005310144,0.00008747948,0.002278727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684163,0.0003054736,0.00727816,0.01621227,0.003938611,0.0006994072,0.00001462397,0.0000530217,0.003082163],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.13367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950307,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6011617087162587,"score_gpt":0.5539434459331514,"score_spread":0.04721826278310737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}