{"id":"W2145219176","doi":"10.1186/1477-7517-6-29","title":"Debunking the claim that abstinence is usually healthier for smokers than switching to a low-risk alternative, and other observations about anti-tobacco-harm-reduction arguments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harm Reduction Journal","topic":"Smoking Behavior and Cessation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Nicotine; Harm; Harm reduction; Tobacco harm reduction; Smokeless tobacco; Abstinence; Health risk; Smoking cessation; Medicine; Consumption (sociology); Curse; Snus; Environmental health; Psychiatry; Psychology; Social psychology; Tobacco use; Public health; Nursing; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007984561,0.0002097247,0.0002264621,0.0002310463,0.0009930102,0.0002250561,0.0001255711,0.00009360985,0.0000675468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009162645,0.0001596768,0.0001228939,0.0002819506,0.00004389866,0.0004303088,0.00001499793,0.000565859,0.000002359488],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002194643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001146585,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001269338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001097457,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983025,0.00008330287,0.000436409,0.0003330714,0.0005039698,0.0003407093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988065,0.00003296237,0.0004506467,0.0002087092,0.000275097,0.0002260769],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001393485,0.000854942,0.4899913,0.000113046,0.0004903934,0.00001657659,0.08759976,0.00201745,0.1591619,0.0003950543,0.0091495,0.2488166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002328257,0.0004364788,0.9585735,0.0006550149,0.0003752418,0.00153649,0.009784576,0.0005182744,0.02108901,0.001267343,0.00312618,0.0003096863],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9794595,0.0001164755,0.008107106,0.009942431,0.001577812,0.0006818127,0.00001377786,0.00004828757,0.00005281758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951477,0.0002827289,0.001327369,0.001655222,0.00129997,0.00003413257,0.000009474966,0.00003100288,0.0002124192],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4685822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7637532,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0721197487261135,"score_gpt":0.3520859837658784,"score_spread":0.2799662350397649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}