{"id":"W2145241014","doi":"10.1016/s0016-3287(02)00054-x","title":"Towards community engagement: six steps to expert learning for future scenario development","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Futures","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Variety (cybernetics); Process (computing); Narrative; Archetype; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Process management; Design thinking; Systems thinking; Community engagement; Knowledge management; Engineering ethics; Business; Political science; Public relations; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Human–computer interaction","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03069008,0.001189343,0.000687434,0.001819962,0.007745159,0.01689013,0.0040909,0.008697281,0.01583026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04162585,0.0006476994,0.000990262,0.001266251,0.009294246,0.02072666,0.017377,0.00938541,0.002612039],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004507751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01918769,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003846945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008905153,"domain_scores_codex":[0.983439,0.01196551,0.0004353573,0.0008195367,0.002178628,0.001161912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9725342,0.01269008,0.001219747,0.00240867,0.004691999,0.006455303],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002333251,0.001481535,0.006815442,0.0008956013,0.0001350477,0.0006102478,0.07814547,0.008167248,0.001909343,0.5209065,0.04130659,0.3393937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004701535,0.0001211671,0.001258965,0.0006442319,0.00002188488,0.0001552314,0.04410902,0.0116065,0.0009697374,0.8589994,0.08197878,0.00008818607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06124894,0.001331331,0.6145996,0.1173585,0.0004959524,0.001975943,0.0001878195,0.0009246023,0.2018773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4577807,0.0009014194,0.528334,0.002613712,0.00008068387,0.001075815,0.0002737378,0.0001666477,0.008773353],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03069008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1623067,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2514960609488885,"score_gpt":0.4170815448384045,"score_spread":0.165585483889516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}