{"id":"W2145326812","doi":"10.1002/wps.20250","title":"At risk or not at risk? A meta‐analysis of the prognostic accuracy of psychometric interviews for psychosis prediction","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Psychiatry","topic":"Schizophrenia research and treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":237,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression","keywords":"Nomogram; Receiver operating characteristic; Medicine; Population; Psychosis; Psychological intervention; Risk assessment; Meta-analysis; Psychometrics; Psychiatry; Psychology; Clinical psychology; Internal medicine; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03950711,0.002873811,0.01375552,0.005043157,0.0006845578,0.004298725,0.002233587,0.002710242,0.002099597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06003605,0.001833887,0.05125802,0.004783276,0.001138611,0.002074026,0.001665372,0.002476438,0.0002634794],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001609825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001592843,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004531717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006366212,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9758232,0.0161561,0.003840401,0.002283395,0.001513391,0.0003835301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9382083,0.04983705,0.006406654,0.003160022,0.001844064,0.0005439209],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005112373,0.00002064544,0.01331536,0.02539658,0.9484488,0.00006591118,0.00004491954,0.0004740412,0.0001635586,0.00006994583,0.0001787919,0.006709103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005599644,0.0002318574,0.006537473,0.002043093,0.9895501,0.00004660819,0.00001923947,0.0003591395,0.00009899085,0.0001907305,0.000349186,0.00001359208],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03702436,0.9576496,0.002967426,0.0005603821,0.0003201897,0.0002815537,0.0006763299,0.00007426483,0.000445964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8053525,0.1867187,0.00420123,0.00106984,0.0004249188,0.0006470222,0.001179688,0.00008223227,0.0003238064],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9862445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.208936,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1112767281354301,"score_gpt":0.3689887588631461,"score_spread":0.2577120307277161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}