{"id":"W2145326812","doi":"10.1002/wps.20250","title":"At risk or not at risk? A meta‐analysis of the prognostic accuracy of psychometric interviews for psychosis prediction","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Psychiatry","topic":"Schizophrenia research and treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":237,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression","keywords":"Nomogram; Receiver operating characteristic; Medicine; Population; Psychosis; Psychological intervention; Risk assessment; Meta-analysis; Psychometrics; Psychiatry; Psychology; Clinical psychology; Internal medicine; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009805849,0.0002740743,0.001061224,0.001278676,0.0001438417,0.00001179948,0.0003069042,0.00008312872,0.0006101305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001080403,0.0001445721,0.001786327,0.005057301,0.0001146778,0.00006290598,0.000118608,0.0002393714,0.00002779388],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001755609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002293588,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003104944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01595957,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99731,0.0003170409,0.0007899749,0.0004819313,0.000756964,0.0003440713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966333,0.0007836243,0.0008465435,0.001133053,0.0002907307,0.0003127815],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02085778,0.001228654,0.8690497,0.0002076508,0.07727538,5.521576e-7,0.0001982951,0.00004472955,0.0000127561,0.0001133307,0.02757402,0.00343712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00757297,0.001410711,0.7691535,0.0000883938,0.2153845,0.000009417851,0.00009022459,0.0008446724,0.0003967231,0.000649687,0.004240375,0.0001589102],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9693723,0.01759211,0.000453887,0.00493142,0.001412345,0.003575594,0.001844293,0.00006344327,0.0007546193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834509,0.0007386403,0.01141636,0.0001831548,0.0001712803,0.0007146429,0.00009502329,0.00003902037,0.003190947],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1381091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8905814,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1112767281354301,"score_gpt":0.3689887588631461,"score_spread":0.2577120307277161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}