{"id":"W2145343514","doi":"10.1146/annurev-anthro-091908-164358","title":"The Audacity of Affect: Gender, Race, and History in Linguistic Accounts of Legitimacy and Belonging","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Anthropology","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":176,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Queer; Sociology; Legitimacy; Race (biology); Gender studies; Compassion; Cultural studies; Neoliberalism (international relations); Aesthetics; Political science; Social science; Politics; Anthropology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004306144,0.00009044375,0.0003915952,0.00005634485,0.00008606247,0.000006296048,0.0001627484,0.00002705265,0.0002092057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003077323,0.00006304181,0.00003836152,0.00002837719,0.002232318,0.0001010531,0.00005489456,0.00009794133,7.001751e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001770443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006782167,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006604331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005510107,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991746,0.0001420644,0.0003747031,0.0001034733,0.00008697659,0.0001181647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989806,0.0002769331,0.0002891262,0.0002590274,0.0001765044,0.00001774633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000269982,0.0001358579,0.0007031472,0.00227052,0.00003505079,0.000004559223,0.05732779,2.034227e-7,0.00004799034,0.9104237,0.003737957,0.02528621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001626417,0.00129178,0.03881783,0.007427223,0.0003508159,0.00005567092,0.1196755,0.00003571383,0.0002978396,0.02898666,0.8007768,0.0006577387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07782178,0.8724759,0.000007806578,0.001641728,0.0001819367,0.0002902795,0.00004013742,0.00001028687,0.0475301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8548054,0.1448118,0.00003846947,0.0002021412,0.00003048697,0.000002871463,0.000003677946,0.000004069942,0.0001011264],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8814371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8225069,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03622600186057846,"score_gpt":0.3455702989779469,"score_spread":0.3093442971173685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}