{"id":"W2145380083","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00445.x","title":"A quantitative assessment of fish passage efficiency","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fish and Fisheries","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":486,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Weir; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Upstream (networking); Environmental science; Habitat; Fragmentation (computing); Range (aeronautics); Upstream and downstream (DNA); Biology; Hydrology (agriculture); Ecology; Geography; Engineering; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02476146,0.0009281196,0.001598809,0.03643503,0.0004110946,0.002515886,0.001157033,0.0007065241,0.004305637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07649697,0.0004254938,0.003539766,0.02466877,0.0009774393,0.003095352,0.001227671,0.0004604819,0.0007566531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009294811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001050666,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001140434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002056328,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9793276,0.005494294,0.007915149,0.001663278,0.005311971,0.0002876013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8287348,0.1127057,0.03022912,0.004402346,0.02300629,0.0009217212],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001469979,0.0001552467,0.5547827,0.1085186,0.02187316,0.0006447819,0.002893402,0.003950439,0.007667033,0.003613071,0.008585237,0.2858463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002512328,0.001608732,0.8522061,0.01834699,0.02067396,0.001857157,0.003811832,0.004136317,0.006745894,0.005331288,0.08475353,0.0002770321],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5666497,0.2291637,0.05648759,0.00174334,0.0007012591,0.002598791,0.1077732,0.0006956976,0.03418669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9234663,0.0232898,0.03205301,0.0003889855,0.0004355791,0.00233361,0.01545895,0.0001035467,0.002470064],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03643503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1309527,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02509768576847093,"score_gpt":0.2394934598655938,"score_spread":0.2143957740971228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}