{"id":"W2145394657","doi":"10.1177/0261018312458487","title":"<i>Sweet Charity</i> , revisited: Organizational responses to food insecurity in Hamilton and Toronto, Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Laidlaw Foundation; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Retrenchment; Food security; Food insecurity; Government (linguistics); Public relations; Face (sociological concept); Food systems; Relevance (law); Sociology; Political science; Business; Economic growth; Public administration; Marketing; Economics; Agriculture; Law; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001735448,0.0003207019,0.0003805551,0.001424982,0.03689792,0.00624697,0.002448853,0.001919722,0.006134277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003963957,0.0005652835,0.0002957938,0.004099065,0.01134514,0.001316304,0.005032381,0.003630051,0.000242183],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2657162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3016847,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99963,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964435,0.0006265874,0.00006778558,0.0001997854,0.0004722129,0.002190193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916571,0.0008017081,0.0004760332,0.000124072,0.001394579,0.005546448],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003504296,0.0002145642,0.1082281,0.0006481904,0.00007114482,0.00612683,0.709129,0.0006102556,0.002051691,0.04371855,0.08127106,0.04758016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003320847,0.00004713295,0.1639282,0.0002818431,0.00002483514,0.000194366,0.7171362,0.0002338138,0.0002772399,0.001084839,0.1166774,0.00008094936],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8687101,0.00559103,0.0004144527,0.0814212,0.0003825478,0.0002114022,0.0004900692,0.00004868562,0.04273055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743894,0.002403012,0.0003409121,0.005573663,0.00003279308,0.0000497768,0.0001187701,0.00002812966,0.01706353],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2657162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8516651,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1311048244221232,"score_gpt":0.4636538102095968,"score_spread":0.3325489857874736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}