{"id":"W2145394657","doi":"10.1177/0261018312458487","title":"<i>Sweet Charity</i> , revisited: Organizational responses to food insecurity in Hamilton and Toronto, Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Laidlaw Foundation; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Retrenchment; Food security; Food insecurity; Government (linguistics); Public relations; Face (sociological concept); Food systems; Relevance (law); Sociology; Political science; Business; Economic growth; Public administration; Marketing; Economics; Agriculture; Law; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005338641,0.0001396502,0.0002760398,0.00008065647,0.001281786,0.00001350422,0.0001172449,0.0002553343,0.0005470768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003584387,0.0001562206,0.00002233325,0.0004028562,0.00009846272,0.0002552714,0.0001451599,0.0004532314,0.00004224268],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001094299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001381128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6516109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7680377,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976478,0.0005417627,0.0004535068,0.0002027814,0.0002912948,0.0008628735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984864,0.000577688,0.00004446313,0.0001221949,0.0001904277,0.0005788079],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006573835,0.0001088614,0.1324003,0.0003151034,0.000006562362,0.000001770933,0.02704824,5.065028e-8,0.00001532889,0.8154532,0.02441608,0.0001687924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005643439,0.0000880775,0.8334457,0.0001099063,0.00001563776,0.000001919841,0.004771019,0.000008227262,0.000006336062,0.008914842,0.1517739,0.0003001101],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9242225,0.0007564512,0.00002138296,0.06303427,0.0006243739,0.0007024031,0.0008286184,0.00006936731,0.009740656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748581,0.00004516156,0.0001471818,0.02208735,0.00262978,0.00005053615,0.000038991,0.00001868714,0.0001241789],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8065383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9858594,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1311048244221232,"score_gpt":0.4636538102095968,"score_spread":0.3325489857874736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}