{"id":"W2145450584","doi":"10.1002/aqc.2493","title":"Opportunities and challenges for analysis of wildlife trade using CITES data – seahorses as a case study","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems","topic":"Aquatic life and conservation","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"InStream Fisheries Research (Canada); University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"CITES; Seahorse; Wildlife trade; Wildlife; Convention; Biology; Business; International trade; Fishery; Ecology; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02482594,0.0006058834,0.0008144734,0.01251629,0.001407785,0.007739983,0.001860245,0.001948537,0.003970927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04378662,0.0003357897,0.001544583,0.01561458,0.001432578,0.006772663,0.002819419,0.001560973,0.001358639],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002031114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002060542,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02273702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02991572,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9831694,0.008824443,0.002063027,0.001587783,0.003777071,0.0005782867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.912484,0.05786448,0.004942608,0.0108108,0.01219534,0.001702774],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005488831,0.00091903,0.710453,0.002321746,0.0009918584,0.005355476,0.01368388,0.01960731,0.005241289,0.02240832,0.0393329,0.1791364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001073384,0.000552089,0.4306321,0.00380192,0.0003524151,0.003931905,0.0830451,0.1245139,0.006709744,0.02878538,0.3172568,0.0003113282],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8352077,0.003241308,0.05475895,0.02033724,0.0004883563,0.0008956368,0.04644144,0.001364492,0.0372649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7970954,0.001280326,0.151338,0.001030244,0.0002964459,0.0003670886,0.04442719,0.0005083889,0.003656942],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02482594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1312937,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2588770919304454,"score_gpt":0.2968558860309577,"score_spread":0.0379787941005123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}