{"id":"W2145483734","doi":"10.1007/s10203-011-0110-6","title":"Allocation of public funds to R&D: a portfolio choice-styled decision model and a biotechnology case study","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decisions in Economics and Finance","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Planner; Resource allocation; Portfolio; Status quo; Portfolio allocation; Economics; Welfare; Public welfare; Distribution (mathematics); Optimal allocation; Social planner; Variety (cybernetics); Actuarial science; Business; Microeconomics; Public economics; Computer science; Finance; Management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005846293,0.001437276,0.002217814,0.001767138,0.001318078,0.005847091,0.002421907,0.007646822,0.01142588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01134832,0.00116923,0.00208016,0.001983794,0.002526463,0.004179196,0.002037648,0.002779772,0.0009536703],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005821825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002120197,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01556189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01061497,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971589,0.001777478,0.00007535165,0.0003013419,0.0001709485,0.000516052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910707,0.006967582,0.0006808485,0.0002579015,0.0003076373,0.0007152516],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001058779,0.0009964789,0.005225515,0.0001357989,0.0001386361,0.001194596,0.0002836829,0.8033752,0.0006276739,0.1699599,0.003667651,0.01333617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004865872,0.0002538038,0.001209588,0.00002502676,0.00007406434,0.000155584,0.0002642182,0.9473039,0.0002812647,0.04839739,0.001487465,0.00006118797],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8278771,0.001406347,0.1066862,0.009841667,0.0001285932,0.0006436239,0.001780385,0.0002574167,0.05137872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9719442,0.0004763128,0.01117225,0.0001613527,0.00005098257,0.0001708529,0.0001837901,0.0000280071,0.01581224],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9941537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0422405,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1890092875416098,"score_gpt":0.2686656772403379,"score_spread":0.07965638969872807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}