{"id":"W2145548588","doi":"10.1109/hpcs.2006.23","title":"Evaluation of Knapsack-Based Scheduling Using the NPACI JOBLOG","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Particle Physics; University of Victoria","funders":"National Science Council; University of Victoria","keywords":"Knapsack problem; Computer science; Grid; Scheduling (production processes); Software deployment; Task (project management); Continuous knapsack problem; Grid computing; Mathematical optimization; Distributed computing; Mathematics; Algorithm; Operating system; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00233424,0.00007741805,0.0001004653,0.00004668089,0.0001139768,0.00009307669,0.0004735998,0.00003463437,0.00001276818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004447278,0.00005205426,0.00005753804,0.000358515,0.00002990882,0.0001029947,0.00005234385,0.00005383946,0.000008056722],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004254647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002042775,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002831181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001386763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985099,0.0002495414,0.0002424325,0.0001732655,0.000671896,0.0001529438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989628,0.00009487448,0.0001348217,0.0003989,0.0003905742,0.00001801688],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[8.068309e-7,0.00003430251,0.0007675483,0.000007482733,0.000008746689,4.054015e-7,0.00004573241,0.9717117,0.001942239,0.02263924,0.0002349004,0.002606903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002539692,0.00001268688,0.0008098104,0.00002464438,0.00001768913,0.000003609689,0.00001236707,0.9936941,0.002346087,0.002529104,0.0002266923,0.00006929609],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1633174,0.0001302924,0.8305978,0.0001714691,0.0002245201,0.0001295927,9.915032e-7,0.00006229719,0.005365579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.966989,8.933152e-8,0.03284802,0.00004518314,0.00008115743,0.000002327174,0.000003186034,0.00000316461,0.00002784536],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8036716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2122711,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05815910683890649,"score_gpt":0.2989881888633882,"score_spread":0.2408290820244817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}