{"id":"W214573613","doi":"10.1007/bf02189740","title":"An automated method to derive habitat preferences of wildlife in GIS and telemetry studies: A flexible software tool and examples of its application","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"National Center For Environmental Assessment","keywords":"Wildlife; Habitat; Endangered species; Software; Telemetry; Computer science; Wildlife conservation; Resource (disambiguation); Geographic information system; Environmental resource management; Geography; Ecology; Remote sensing; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007811024,0.0001202412,0.0003259994,0.0003015397,0.0001163978,0.00002002279,0.0002836012,0.00004246357,0.00003913067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002121104,0.0001022418,0.0000273774,0.0007221156,0.0003273715,0.0003763178,0.0001587908,0.0002733014,0.000009751386],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006416189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006952694,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003394491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005831971,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995807,0.002494717,0.0006571795,0.0002690257,0.0005092489,0.0002628622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983663,0.0007901748,0.0002976847,0.0001887055,0.0002025853,0.0001545644],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001441819,0.0001624877,0.9695619,0.00008820281,0.00004917087,0.00001436845,0.002536841,0.000719314,0.007829662,0.00009550977,0.001836895,0.01696146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006105379,0.001138323,0.9919539,0.0001527189,0.00001430503,0.00004095204,0.002286218,0.0003327777,0.001582745,0.0003596743,0.001411708,0.0001161194],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954886,0.0004438235,0.003032448,0.0004716442,0.00002095359,0.0003201745,0.000005600737,0.00001419494,0.0002024901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.957786,0.0003640541,0.04156957,0.0002095024,0.00002003866,0.000007662127,0.000001080268,0.00001490721,0.0000272104],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03853712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41693,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08638930619110752,"score_gpt":0.3878453367692889,"score_spread":0.3014560305781814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}