{"id":"W2145743906","doi":"10.1017/s0008423903778743","title":"Rational Choice and Socio-Psychological Explanation for Opinion on Quebec Sovereignty","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Resentment; Sovereignty; Ambivalence; Argument (complex analysis); Feeling; State (computer science); Set (abstract data type); Political science; Federalism; Social psychology; Referendum; Quality (philosophy); Scholarship; Psychology; Positive economics; Sociology; Economics; Epistemology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001245268,0.00004711399,0.00008457711,0.000401434,0.001465107,0.0003901191,0.0001896331,0.00006535002,0.0004313905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003629166,0.00005056262,0.00004364015,0.0002152225,0.002000813,0.0003586918,0.00000223079,0.0001162403,0.000007668685],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002077283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007320708,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5875306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9413607,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987886,0.00007400566,0.000160232,0.0001301068,0.0003219151,0.0005251209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978445,0.0002220164,0.00006456985,0.00005161793,0.0002271118,0.001590248],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001516117,0.000007053814,0.0004829129,0.000001342446,0.000001153906,0.00000207114,0.000426737,0.000001491912,0.00001025336,0.994287,0.003780962,0.0009975361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000395086,0.0001655398,0.1480674,0.00002525449,0.000005902171,0.00002256667,0.001966849,0.000009279593,0.00001529354,0.0818052,0.7673656,0.0001560823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6941141,0.0007279108,0.001604919,0.03840454,0.006192962,0.0006202491,0.0001560749,0.0000204107,0.2581588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977224,0.00000967716,0.0002124663,0.001101104,0.0003485768,0.000001712179,6.785804e-7,0.000002438178,0.000600872],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9124818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998348,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04353184345277246,"score_gpt":0.3320482837214992,"score_spread":0.2885164402687267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}