{"id":"W2145743906","doi":"10.1017/s0008423903778743","title":"Rational Choice and Socio-Psychological Explanation for Opinion on Quebec Sovereignty","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Resentment; Sovereignty; Ambivalence; Argument (complex analysis); Feeling; State (computer science); Set (abstract data type); Political science; Federalism; Social psychology; Referendum; Quality (philosophy); Scholarship; Psychology; Positive economics; Sociology; Economics; Epistemology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003559208,0.0003099287,0.0003149699,0.001512279,0.003569867,0.004516901,0.0009721312,0.002609211,0.008260989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008696108,0.0001371978,0.0005259118,0.001261057,0.01227191,0.002608967,0.001491526,0.001658915,0.0003026541],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01781162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004295175,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2751183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1950859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976787,0.001079674,0.00003969884,0.0001425977,0.0004319013,0.0006275389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941276,0.003401483,0.0008838079,0.0002725597,0.0009471477,0.0003673928],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006734656,0.00006255112,0.01309875,0.00004567408,0.00002779959,0.0003137956,0.01573472,0.001850654,0.0001425425,0.9592019,0.003213956,0.00624035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001059756,0.00005831283,0.04266521,0.0001027015,0.00003350282,0.0001241127,0.03057826,0.016992,0.0001373232,0.8851011,0.02402985,0.00007160032],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.590748,0.0009531287,0.01151919,0.05301378,0.0001503085,0.00007919272,0.0002121302,0.00003305885,0.3432912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971668,0.00008247784,0.0003489455,0.0004534175,0.00002483527,0.000009575798,0.00002276938,0.000002608079,0.001888491],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7248817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5470338,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04353184345277246,"score_gpt":0.3320482837214992,"score_spread":0.2885164402687267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}