{"id":"W2145859722","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01374.x","title":"Balancing ecological complexity in predictive models: a reassessment of risk models in the mountain pine beetle system","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; Division of Chemistry; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Ecology; Mountain pine beetle; Predictive modelling; Environmental resource management; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Environmental science; Biology; Business; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00416546,0.0001245654,0.0003959762,0.0001508855,0.00006736441,0.000005256817,0.0003998135,0.0001525512,0.0001167449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002798152,0.00008815635,0.00006055409,0.0002775917,0.00024367,0.0001292137,0.0001761826,0.0004694909,0.000008547508],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008752475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002884984,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000250167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00896822,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982611,0.0001760305,0.0007755613,0.0001819416,0.0002522749,0.0003531163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988121,0.000408251,0.0005581941,0.0001550827,0.00001448003,0.00005184453],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001000502,0.001163149,0.07371663,0.00003146159,0.00005224707,0.00021548,0.002969827,0.8596246,0.0002026078,0.05977169,0.0002775676,0.0009742207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001116137,0.000438484,0.8609939,0.00001105428,0.00002626322,0.00004952322,0.003722992,0.06776465,0.00001915393,0.06576513,0.00001775437,0.00007493779],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9668494,0.00001169876,0.008833998,0.00006965933,0.000113552,0.0004162536,0.000004309089,0.000006125071,0.02369501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975578,0.00002839662,0.002157795,0.0001929776,0.00002948933,0.00002272692,0.000001464414,0.00000588554,0.000003526457],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.79186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5004478,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02030145665237262,"score_gpt":0.2453618807729922,"score_spread":0.2250604241206196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}