{"id":"W2145945897","doi":"10.4236/jssm.2008.12015","title":"Systems Plan for Combating Identity Theft – A Theoretical Framework","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Service Science and Management","topic":"Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Identity theft; Identity (music); Issuer; The Internet; Business; Perspective (graphical); Planner; Point (geometry); Internet privacy; Government (linguistics); Task (project management); Computer security; Public relations; Marketing; Computer science; Economics; Finance; Political science; Management; World Wide Web","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005812474,0.00106045,0.0004949159,0.005188857,0.004518405,0.01059243,0.003045528,0.006819309,0.01665259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007926748,0.0007126385,0.001154074,0.002311614,0.01202413,0.01365333,0.005542388,0.003337269,0.002232406],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005517251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01151117,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008598085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004906269,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962128,0.001704732,0.0002172603,0.000527915,0.0009029955,0.0004343098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959105,0.001866466,0.0005960283,0.0004270421,0.0007429565,0.0004570171],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000240272,0.00001726127,0.0001576394,0.00002420633,0.000003833089,0.00004797367,0.0002393519,0.004385605,0.00003419077,0.9910684,0.000960073,0.003058998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004008097,0.0000895047,0.0002592672,0.0001906075,0.00002422736,0.0001718883,0.002441169,0.05189882,0.0002609095,0.8827083,0.06188655,0.00002865744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01128525,0.001230534,0.6936998,0.03385884,0.0003842761,0.0009602099,0.0002104206,0.0003712907,0.2579994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6278602,0.003402545,0.3047229,0.001940194,0.000715457,0.001969725,0.0003859649,0.0001264467,0.05887655],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01665259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05570847,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02901287678617546,"score_gpt":0.2804822855633359,"score_spread":0.2514694087771605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}