{"id":"W2146175970","doi":"","title":"Probing normalized institutional discourses about writing: The case of the doctoral thesis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of academic language and learning","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Academic writing; Professional writing; Vision; Pedagogy; Higher education; Perspective (graphical); Psychological intervention; Political science; Psychology; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06962252,0.0008635087,0.001249444,0.004763761,0.05006667,0.03298721,0.004769657,0.01072481,0.002760354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1230961,0.001051757,0.001177237,0.004380049,0.1269024,0.02161804,0.02361709,0.0194697,0.0005182395],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02606381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0196834,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01142408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01285192,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8645779,0.1134395,0.003120862,0.005415172,0.009454198,0.003992375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8092887,0.1610447,0.008429056,0.009610228,0.006838154,0.004789155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001654542,0.00001732697,0.0003905605,0.00006095501,0.000006151789,0.0007892958,0.852845,0.00009202555,0.0003398587,0.1416225,0.0008103914,0.003009327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003539652,0.00004262548,0.000747561,0.0004797773,0.00002161978,0.0009948567,0.8000501,0.0006264229,0.001238755,0.06918102,0.1265162,0.00006581332],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5262009,0.006727304,0.05629043,0.1240105,0.00132928,0.0003463416,0.0001178483,0.0002880609,0.2846895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882284,0.0007626247,0.00415668,0.001826541,0.0002199922,0.00009954956,0.00002568524,0.0001235603,0.00455705],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9499334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3682035,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01916321907251048,"score_gpt":0.2854380481082054,"score_spread":0.266274829035695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}