{"id":"W2146220287","doi":"10.1177/0021998314568168","title":"Curved fiber paths optimization of a composite cylindrical shell via Kriging-based approach","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Composite Materials","topic":"Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science; Composite laminates; Sequential quadratic programming; Finite element method; Curvilinear coordinates; Fiber; Shell (structure); Buckling; Flexibility (engineering); Maximization; Minification; Displacement (psychology); Structural engineering; Kriging; Optimal design; Quadratic programming; Composite number; Computer science; Composite material; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Geometry; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009753439,0.0002751947,0.0007401714,0.0003707038,0.00007731091,0.0002114354,0.0008618648,0.0001205087,0.00004566175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007967278,0.0002389892,0.0001463809,0.0005092594,0.00008753018,0.0008717845,0.0001812156,0.000169746,0.00001500858],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001369689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001950717,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008180948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.074414e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969947,0.0004824117,0.001203565,0.0002981322,0.0007348444,0.0002863569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963386,0.0001386618,0.001491611,0.0004221529,0.001338552,0.0002704427],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002082646,0.0004019605,0.0001240827,0.00002849016,0.00004932436,0.00002466661,0.0002682884,0.946298,0.05162167,0.0001174254,0.0000769085,0.0007809106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002976117,0.0003899637,0.0002532012,0.00009336301,0.00004539717,0.0001710381,0.00001438534,0.8364088,0.1588034,0.0002405541,0.0002928321,0.0003109703],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01420897,0.0001076875,0.983934,0.0001510014,0.0007362337,0.0002711389,0.00001353374,0.00005677815,0.0005206029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2500892,0.000008350396,0.7495601,0.0001185969,0.0001419559,0.000004457546,0.00001732253,0.00002649146,0.00003359888],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2358802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9745699,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02235849352608836,"score_gpt":0.2656718609657895,"score_spread":0.2433133674397012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}