{"id":"W2146220287","doi":"10.1177/0021998314568168","title":"Curved fiber paths optimization of a composite cylindrical shell via Kriging-based approach","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Composite Materials","topic":"Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science; Composite laminates; Sequential quadratic programming; Finite element method; Curvilinear coordinates; Fiber; Shell (structure); Buckling; Flexibility (engineering); Maximization; Minification; Displacement (psychology); Structural engineering; Kriging; Optimal design; Quadratic programming; Composite number; Computer science; Composite material; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Geometry; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005195977,0.0009299213,0.000750639,0.00061602,0.0003167738,0.0004729308,0.0005629902,0.000983402,0.001199326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008994953,0.0005112928,0.0005302421,0.0004218117,0.0004775271,0.0003709041,0.0003906213,0.0004261569,0.000240684],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006514241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001325476,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008366675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01093186,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998738,0.00004485674,0.000004771854,0.00002443943,0.00003185148,0.00002035524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996313,0.0001933925,0.00005364783,0.00001959056,0.00008295804,0.0000191963],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001057047,0.000006741133,0.0001082603,0.00001369357,0.000004435825,0.00001382204,0.000008407344,0.995174,0.001108437,0.0004694039,0.00004571467,0.003036496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001733274,0.000008094132,0.00003269207,0.00000149733,0.000001289429,0.00000256088,0.000002350547,0.9994497,0.0002533361,0.0001747758,0.00007026321,0.000001680567],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09612113,0.0002013908,0.9001895,0.00007982418,0.00001165171,0.00005966218,0.00008555525,0.0003545612,0.002896719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6441344,0.0001695465,0.3521734,0.00003512627,0.000006799454,0.0001885653,0.0001858791,0.0001391447,0.002967091],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008366675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01663595,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02235849352608836,"score_gpt":0.2656718609657895,"score_spread":0.2433133674397012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}