{"id":"W2146310519","doi":"10.1029/2003gl018025","title":"A CHAMP‐only gravity field model from kinematic orbits using the energy integral","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geophysical Research Letters","topic":"Geophysics and Gravity Measurements","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Gravitational field; Geodesy; Satellite; Orbit (dynamics); Physics; Kinematics; A priori and a posteriori; Field (mathematics); Gravitation; Gravitational potential; Potential energy; Classical mechanics; Geophysics; Geology; Mathematics; Astronomy; Aerospace engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003917145,0.0004412321,0.0004682049,0.000502523,0.0002822396,0.0004759534,0.0006038,0.0003842466,0.001322272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00096595,0.0002458346,0.0004974899,0.0007848607,0.0003090049,0.0007982357,0.0003548563,0.000520155,0.0004255997],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004805001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007510586,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01786426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01034843,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998996,0.00001699319,0.000006593976,0.00002239668,0.00004207195,0.00001234284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998189,0.00004769097,0.00002555274,0.00005983528,0.0000383325,0.000009726772],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001102645,0.00003434156,0.005531568,0.00004759191,0.00008382477,0.00007704535,0.00007062733,0.9540254,0.005137788,0.005173621,0.0009956651,0.02871239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001542723,0.00002043905,0.002234304,0.000005046983,0.00001085566,0.00003128059,0.00001065327,0.9942338,0.00128399,0.001279154,0.0008607756,0.00001427543],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6747735,0.0003849336,0.308569,0.0004157452,0.00008281376,0.0001035125,0.001911287,0.0032412,0.01051814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9474435,0.0001522579,0.04717039,0.00002647926,0.00001844004,0.00006185425,0.002406967,0.0002865588,0.002433551],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01786426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03552055,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07736494257911786,"score_gpt":0.299917007564044,"score_spread":0.2225520649849262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}