{"id":"W2146422342","doi":"10.3732/ajb.91.10.1494","title":"Assessing red algal supraordinal diversity and taxonomy in the context of contemporary systematic data","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Botany","topic":"Marine and coastal plant biology","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":196,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover","keywords":"Biology; Red algae; Systematics; Paraphyly; Algae; Taxonomy (biology); Context (archaeology); Diversity (politics); Evolutionary biology; Ecology; Anthropology; Phylogenetics; Sociology; Genetics; Paleontology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008940436,0.00006716506,0.0003475767,0.0000564483,0.00009017866,0.00002695104,0.0004011679,0.00001506385,0.00002052706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007192587,0.00003998728,0.00002890001,0.0001308421,0.0002129304,0.0003911533,0.00009282106,0.0001382226,8.994392e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002642176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008042291,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01214381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001914044,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991083,0.0002117441,0.0003332663,0.00009014793,0.0001546448,0.0001019412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990109,0.0002814353,0.0004817231,0.000148165,0.00003071081,0.00004703509],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001449477,0.00002642143,0.9721467,0.0001251651,0.00005112356,0.000201155,0.0004982082,0.00001082609,0.0000382182,0.00002518083,0.0001126654,0.02661932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001179186,0.001460288,0.9528131,0.0008214902,0.00007785459,0.001772513,0.04030687,0.0003007634,0.00001438593,0.000170651,0.0009105328,0.0001723283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968678,0.0006317507,0.0001263863,0.0003580122,0.00005153242,0.0001015429,0.00002907826,0.000001418344,0.001832484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993967,0.000032748,0.000310148,0.0002177775,0.00002920465,1.062036e-7,0.00000680394,7.415513e-7,0.000005797194],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03980866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944344,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05991522794463457,"score_gpt":0.2426718768012891,"score_spread":0.1827566488566545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}