{"id":"W2146611572","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01877.x","title":"Molecular analysis of poplar defense against herbivory: comparison of wound‐ and insect elicitor‐induced gene expression","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Phytologist","topic":"Insect-Plant Interactions and Control","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":204,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Washington","keywords":"Elicitor; Biology; Gene; Insect; Plant defense against herbivory; Gene expression; Secondary metabolism; Defence mechanisms; Botany; Cell biology; Genetics; Biosynthesis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009672677,0.0002795777,0.0001600611,0.0003567315,0.0001409427,0.000254233,0.00006747729,0.0001482845,0.0009076937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001011933,0.00007715479,0.0001961018,0.0002196235,0.00013902,0.0001589516,0.0001113701,0.0002837305,0.0002472522],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001897205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001011392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003713775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006954335,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999177,0.00001019394,0.000004201912,0.0000270902,0.0000154673,0.0000253222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998783,0.00003226647,0.0000335405,0.000007619366,0.000015571,0.00003268953],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002748741,0.000004481932,0.0005002582,0.00001509647,0.0000021958,0.00001872653,0.00001040393,0.0000114028,0.9990535,0.00001355995,0.000004702928,0.0003382236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001053803,0.0003566473,0.1373528,0.000009459891,0.00004521609,0.0004729321,0.0001406378,0.000941358,0.8589071,0.0000780878,0.001677038,0.000008128776],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960501,0.0007863354,0.001678949,0.00003787302,0.000005717889,0.0000113686,0.0008676213,0.00002801221,0.0005340407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884878,0.0007632618,0.003041983,0.00009540705,0.00001248432,0.0000418469,0.004801428,0.00002013295,0.002735552],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0009076937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003036499,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02275598173263939,"score_gpt":0.2506153469341345,"score_spread":0.2278593652014951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}