{"id":"W2146678744","doi":"10.1115/ipc2004-0092","title":"Field Inspection Module for Hydrotechnical Hazards","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2004 International Pipeline Conference, Volumes 1, 2, and 3","topic":"Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"BGC Engineering (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Hazard; Pipeline (software); Vulnerability (computing); Natural hazard; Engineering; Risk management; Pipeline transport; Hazard analysis; Terrain; Field (mathematics); Risk analysis (engineering); Forensic engineering; Construction engineering; Civil engineering; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Computer security; Cartography; Business; Geography; Environmental engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008425138,0.0001411367,0.000173759,0.0001151892,0.00008233837,0.00007574466,0.0001630071,0.0001665947,0.0001907698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001249347,0.0001282117,0.0001154112,0.00009067776,0.00006821812,0.0001610618,0.00002560329,0.0002262184,0.00001641518],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008004629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003369024,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002343611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003173952,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992217,0.00000615787,0.0002573972,0.000207883,0.000153836,0.0001530031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995691,0.00003584208,0.00002885241,0.0001209057,0.0001813325,0.00006403206],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006699323,0.0005701401,0.004699221,0.0006481881,0.00144757,0.00002780111,0.001233326,0.2694651,0.01695812,0.2411564,0.07975052,0.3833737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001152045,0.0001464285,0.001233016,0.00008684516,0.00006266008,0.000029418,0.0001056901,0.8923665,0.007896398,0.0627569,0.03378895,0.0003751191],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3988319,0.0005327628,0.5823563,0.005231248,0.001829011,0.0003384668,0.0001067178,0.0006041076,0.01016942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960025,0.0002647757,0.002146325,0.0001414111,0.000401851,0.00002701048,0.00006047702,0.00001170048,0.0009439351],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6229014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5228323,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01114826983437804,"score_gpt":0.2453303606169862,"score_spread":0.2341820907826082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}