{"id":"W2146678744","doi":"10.1115/ipc2004-0092","title":"Field Inspection Module for Hydrotechnical Hazards","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2004 International Pipeline Conference, Volumes 1, 2, and 3","topic":"Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"BGC Engineering (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Hazard; Pipeline (software); Vulnerability (computing); Natural hazard; Engineering; Risk management; Pipeline transport; Hazard analysis; Terrain; Field (mathematics); Risk analysis (engineering); Forensic engineering; Construction engineering; Civil engineering; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Computer security; Cartography; Business; Geography; Environmental engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001137186,0.0006758245,0.0004148149,0.001591978,0.0002608337,0.0006904911,0.001361111,0.0004325566,0.06747591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002871172,0.0003731021,0.0003462036,0.0007682051,0.0001309922,0.001019362,0.001150862,0.0004691527,0.02603898],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004801427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006226852,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001861313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002050249,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995177,0.00005547724,0.0000296946,0.0001089474,0.0002534725,0.00003482361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998179,0.0004231618,0.0001511973,0.0005204041,0.0006319583,0.00009427765],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003306547,0.0002638505,0.01172518,0.0004379195,0.0000399397,0.0002194029,0.0003292575,0.003212583,0.02400135,0.003346468,0.2557778,0.7003156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001682024,0.0004212678,0.06018068,0.0002316594,0.00005985541,0.001136184,0.0002304046,0.08352794,0.05705696,0.006820338,0.7900396,0.0001269268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.03411014,0.0003699122,0.6023486,0.0007017489,0.000239858,0.002541245,0.04632347,0.2493061,0.06405891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2122813,0.0004126492,0.6067139,0.001043466,0.000221493,0.002481341,0.05489551,0.0113555,0.1105947],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06747591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2257294,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01114826983437804,"score_gpt":0.2453303606169862,"score_spread":0.2341820907826082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}