{"id":"W2146713890","doi":"10.1109/bsc.2006.1644638","title":"Secure Copyright Protection of Digital Images Using Nonnegative Matrix Factorization","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Digital watermarking; Robustness (evolution); Singular value decomposition; Matrix decomposition; Computer science; Embedding; Factorization; Non-negative matrix factorization; Digital image; Matrix (chemical analysis); Computer vision; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Image (mathematics); Theoretical computer science; Image processing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006316734,0.0006663139,0.0006052075,0.0006862476,0.000403212,0.0005657562,0.0004865376,0.0005996205,0.001221649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001651196,0.0001940793,0.0006941702,0.0007443179,0.0007585988,0.00121915,0.0005237929,0.0007075887,0.0004997198],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002359951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004258438,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006555076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006512847,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992613,0.000155338,0.00004439238,0.0001267384,0.0003517339,0.00006037104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994011,0.0001593469,0.0001395699,0.0001408382,0.0001318214,0.00002740378],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003090175,0.0001570001,0.0005126781,0.0002969416,0.0001143945,0.0005440282,0.0001685039,0.1037135,0.3547302,0.0451243,0.003433665,0.4908958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000410338,0.0002684561,0.0004037354,0.00001948747,0.00003594267,0.0004428173,0.00003017419,0.9167523,0.06101753,0.015898,0.005035978,0.00005447533],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01815349,0.0004991696,0.9796972,0.0001848414,0.00007949839,0.00002688438,0.00002216396,0.0002372528,0.001099573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4948612,0.001178564,0.5007984,0.0001432422,0.0002386711,0.00007561836,0.0001311404,0.00004875844,0.002524265],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001221649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004086852,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.011753805487773,"score_gpt":0.2497523670591389,"score_spread":0.237998561571366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}