{"id":"W2146725453","doi":"10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.05.030","title":"Biphasic growth in fish II: Empirical assessment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Biology","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology; Fishery; Mathematics; Zoology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008079677,0.0007521277,0.0009516716,0.00140861,0.0005322377,0.001170723,0.001707606,0.001198781,0.008032032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05535696,0.0005643204,0.00101864,0.001180256,0.002829701,0.001416213,0.00233857,0.001329185,0.001035673],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001034204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007535794,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006016859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003246562,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999005,0.0005026467,0.00006059571,0.0001977835,0.0001191126,0.0001148478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9384867,0.05080008,0.004250091,0.003295437,0.001512506,0.001655284],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006285012,0.0008702294,0.8729122,0.0006285398,0.0004041909,0.0009405328,0.00271959,0.02941443,0.009121858,0.02773812,0.001515457,0.04744988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004302699,0.001558948,0.7291664,0.0002070513,0.0003069474,0.002034649,0.003477203,0.2011203,0.002507451,0.05717597,0.001846507,0.0001681781],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877504,0.0006376279,0.007673746,0.000210632,0.00001704695,0.00006315202,0.0002439826,0.00004811964,0.00335537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972023,0.0001673079,0.001614238,0.00006612837,0.00001640502,0.00003524257,0.0001746669,0.00002386643,0.0006998146],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008079677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04272991,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01485610367468038,"score_gpt":0.288002822976078,"score_spread":0.2731467193013976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}