{"id":"W2146748322","doi":"10.1007/s10845-011-0527-3","title":"Mitigating the risk of information leakage in a two-level supply chain through optimal supplier selection","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing","topic":"Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Supply chain; Leakage (economics); Information leakage; Supply chain risk management; Risk analysis (engineering); Supply chain management; Risk management; Computer science; Business; Service management; Economics; Computer security; Marketing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003298993,0.0008259384,0.001931086,0.0009188185,0.00100937,0.002454991,0.001511999,0.001949346,0.002730267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01088921,0.00100519,0.0007602373,0.001646354,0.001249677,0.003117602,0.002485948,0.001298193,0.0002506624],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00123264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001930501,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001741058,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977761,0.001024841,0.0001049606,0.0003277058,0.0003841041,0.0003823812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909483,0.006341895,0.001116686,0.0005165068,0.0007651661,0.0003115634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004175617,0.0001139271,0.002319833,0.00008445414,0.000129833,0.0003004414,0.0001348841,0.9587513,0.002417351,0.01081966,0.0004488165,0.02406196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002321785,0.00007771146,0.0003451368,0.000007602186,0.0000405914,0.00004995771,0.00003588857,0.9876642,0.0006093308,0.01101143,0.0001206479,0.00001433691],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2321607,0.0003140347,0.763336,0.0009409535,0.00003770438,0.00008362332,0.0000710688,0.0002296143,0.002826265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808946,0.00009824138,0.01783141,0.00004232988,0.00001583952,0.00002239265,0.00002329842,0.0000119117,0.00105998],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003298993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01744699,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02480210635668278,"score_gpt":0.2429607871591319,"score_spread":0.2181586808024491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}