{"id":"W2146748322","doi":"10.1007/s10845-011-0527-3","title":"Mitigating the risk of information leakage in a two-level supply chain through optimal supplier selection","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing","topic":"Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Supply chain; Leakage (economics); Information leakage; Supply chain risk management; Risk analysis (engineering); Supply chain management; Risk management; Computer science; Business; Service management; Economics; Computer security; Marketing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001274251,0.0001959644,0.0002706933,0.0005120719,0.0001518286,0.0001273006,0.0004437214,0.000048134,0.0003330625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001318632,0.000129464,0.0001859468,0.0003053523,0.00006732669,0.002417463,0.0001493775,0.0004296281,0.00004305715],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007912673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002298269,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002104308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002637522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981028,0.00003493048,0.0009889198,0.0001206064,0.0004467989,0.0003059477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982694,0.00008476281,0.00131715,0.0001581008,0.0001562237,0.00001434482],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001453055,0.0009021549,0.4536127,0.001218312,0.0008555696,0.0001034576,0.0436517,0.2967164,0.001309327,0.01403115,0.00354533,0.1826009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003626506,0.000273112,0.3881254,0.001269972,0.0005923284,0.0001110918,0.06926716,0.03598128,0.4595557,0.01418981,0.02577182,0.001235897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9718941,0.00005981398,0.02389421,0.000176739,0.0003741573,0.0002990679,0.000002031734,0.00001559597,0.003284319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955819,0.0001635264,0.003502989,0.0003132607,0.0003712128,0.000007391805,0.000003422951,0.00001439989,0.00004192193],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4582463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.527939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02480210635668278,"score_gpt":0.2429607871591319,"score_spread":0.2181586808024491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}