{"id":"W2146752977","doi":"10.1139/l11-002","title":"Methodology for seismic risk assessment for tubular steel wind turbine towers: application to Canadian seismic environment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Seismic Performance and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tower; Seismic hazard; Turbine; Seismic analysis; Seismic risk; Incremental Dynamic Analysis; Earthquake scenario; Environmental Seismic Intensity scale; Seismic loading; Structural engineering; Engineering; Response spectrum; Hazard; Environmental science; Civil engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001089382,0.0008105514,0.0004046394,0.001660942,0.0009791781,0.0007448724,0.001527775,0.0004622573,0.002715975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003024525,0.0002788273,0.0004949206,0.001116705,0.0005325218,0.0003741616,0.0007799504,0.0004749631,0.0002171138],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004663035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01061605,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4955751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5895979,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994625,0.00007999398,0.0000248755,0.00005867909,0.0003085297,0.00006529684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991792,0.000196463,0.00009479652,0.00003298646,0.0004656757,0.00003081169],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003417362,0.00003718047,0.007065563,0.0001019309,0.00003510113,0.0001767366,0.0002614702,0.8698308,0.004845316,0.0195691,0.0009864932,0.09705616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000502011,0.00002548117,0.002439585,0.00001509993,0.00001357547,0.00008175932,0.0001477983,0.9904152,0.001431298,0.003239538,0.002160544,0.0000250569],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05947286,0.0001327572,0.9320186,0.0001337823,0.00001357794,0.0003778608,0.0004207618,0.0003489439,0.007080887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4901531,0.0003729987,0.5021385,0.00003209722,0.000009171099,0.0003756282,0.0004545396,0.00008173815,0.006382205],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5044249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.985381,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01979593685891499,"score_gpt":0.2208647491889723,"score_spread":0.2010688123300574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}