{"id":"W2146752977","doi":"10.1139/l11-002","title":"Methodology for seismic risk assessment for tubular steel wind turbine towers: application to Canadian seismic environment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Seismic Performance and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tower; Seismic hazard; Turbine; Seismic analysis; Seismic risk; Incremental Dynamic Analysis; Earthquake scenario; Environmental Seismic Intensity scale; Seismic loading; Structural engineering; Engineering; Response spectrum; Hazard; Environmental science; Civil engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006610088,0.0002341338,0.0003834654,0.0008295534,0.0001051442,0.00003093478,0.0003038613,0.0001258429,0.00009344935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006695797,0.0002567073,0.0001899757,0.0001860803,0.0000156792,0.0001824748,0.000006285325,0.0002452858,0.000007499193],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009573598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004262073,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02298835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1691992,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986182,0.00001578935,0.0004604381,0.0001757039,0.0001044563,0.0006254555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984921,0.00007352537,0.00009459222,0.0002408221,0.00009059582,0.001008351],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005942761,0.000003884379,0.0003596912,0.00005671976,0.0002272172,0.000009424745,0.0005575662,0.9875115,0.001191358,0.00004920518,0.002011461,0.008015985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004887548,0.0001580679,0.001819445,0.00004995944,0.0002114861,0.00003614245,0.0001499412,0.7638452,0.001470663,0.0002072271,0.2312175,0.0003455524],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05464404,0.0005817694,0.9431999,0.0002538656,0.0005005171,0.0004075588,0.0001394292,0.00002386335,0.0002490975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9629783,0.00008272765,0.03616504,0.0002913101,0.0002932192,0.00005986229,0.00002006987,0.00006748601,0.00004198043],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9083343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999885,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01979593685891499,"score_gpt":0.2208647491889723,"score_spread":0.2010688123300574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}