{"id":"W2146765982","doi":"10.2340/16501977-0952","title":"Usability testing of two e-learning resources: Methods to maximize potential for clinician use","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","topic":"Usability and User Interface Design","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Usability; Navigability; Session (web analytics); Resource (disambiguation); Relevance (law); Quality (philosophy); Categorization; Computer science; Cognitive walkthrough; Web usability; Human–computer interaction; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01609775,0.000148467,0.0005652845,0.0003057449,0.00009793171,0.00003348643,0.0005616428,0.00007026891,0.00002336715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05691697,0.0001134433,0.0001965493,0.0006172511,0.0001852039,0.0009938496,0.00009069107,0.0003195023,0.000002178012],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001011618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007817995,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004997443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002557682,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996212,0.001246414,0.001500513,0.0002266585,0.000512576,0.0003018338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824832,0.01428528,0.0009469265,0.0004162154,0.00156686,0.0003015194],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001292583,0.001170473,0.3644345,0.000742211,0.0001970543,0.000003303789,0.08827303,0.02651841,0.08862062,0.003898625,0.002692484,0.4221567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01452517,0.04471696,0.6695106,0.003125394,0.0006700857,0.0002946591,0.01636633,0.1192109,0.01348811,0.04875611,0.06804731,0.001288404],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.4281181,0.00009678471,0.5682948,0.002593933,0.0006356762,0.0002192233,7.598813e-7,0.00001594714,0.00002481407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4370739,0.00000119228,0.5624505,0.0001612469,0.000279817,0.000004523428,2.219584e-7,0.000006675723,0.00002188304],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4208683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.951027,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09749781756499752,"score_gpt":0.4136881073714319,"score_spread":0.3161902898064344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}