{"id":"W2146779029","doi":"10.1109/61.853023","title":"A method for determining customer and utility harmonic contributions at the point of common coupling","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery","topic":"Power Quality and Harmonics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":327,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Total harmonic distortion; Harmonic; Electrical impedance; Revenue; Coupling (piping); Distortion (music); Harmonic analysis; Point (geometry); Power quality; Electronic engineering; Limit (mathematics); Electrical engineering; Engineering; Computer science; Mathematics; Physics; Economics; Voltage; Acoustics; Finance; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001287046,0.001434303,0.0009902535,0.004147727,0.0009272772,0.001586869,0.00165165,0.0009419701,0.003568649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004613354,0.0005925478,0.0006159851,0.001811965,0.0006787578,0.001916601,0.001389318,0.001464916,0.001850318],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000777539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001178574,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002598651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003513349,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974197,0.0004467927,0.00009868979,0.0005328352,0.00138913,0.0001128303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974336,0.0007119938,0.0002603513,0.0003525085,0.001163074,0.00007838126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001985942,0.0001522396,0.005791377,0.0002987357,0.0001281993,0.0002625136,0.0005005635,0.05661941,0.06310213,0.05468484,0.006922248,0.8113392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001098568,0.0003739227,0.006827576,0.0001040651,0.0001739616,0.001719197,0.0002622404,0.8298807,0.07574262,0.03637202,0.04804202,0.0003918323],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001391096,0.00005730911,0.9968919,0.00001858981,0.00003566064,0.00004192628,0.00003608695,0.0003267052,0.001200619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09268145,0.0002248363,0.9014795,0.00005551439,0.00006944549,0.0002139076,0.0001683817,0.0001715545,0.004935297],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004147727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01193833,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02223999008414482,"score_gpt":0.2775391380874982,"score_spread":0.2552991480033534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}