{"id":"W2146779391","doi":"10.5194/angeo-32-1177-2014","title":"Comparison of methods for modelling geomagnetically induced currents","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annales Geophysicae","topic":"Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada","funders":"Natural Resources Canada","keywords":"Admittance parameters; Geomagnetically induced current; Nodal analysis; Voltage; Ground; Transformer; Electric power transmission; Physics; Admittance; Matrix (chemical analysis); Electrical impedance; Electrical engineering; Earth's magnetic field; Engineering; Geomagnetic storm; Magnetic field; Materials science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001219307,0.0007765804,0.0005145692,0.001073551,0.0003475407,0.0011526,0.001750079,0.0009056872,0.004232347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00423451,0.0003480268,0.0008149928,0.0009801736,0.0003713851,0.001470627,0.0007160982,0.0007754801,0.001338981],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008183796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009392604,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008356718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00583639,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993203,0.0002021117,0.00003777714,0.00005300991,0.000359963,0.0000268392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980715,0.001088219,0.0001150518,0.000132165,0.0005532647,0.00003988497],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000188632,0.0001172403,0.001840911,0.000429519,0.0001262925,0.0001300371,0.000338465,0.7784622,0.005399775,0.03221956,0.001389448,0.179358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001795869,0.000022005,0.0002350291,0.00003278922,0.000009685546,0.00003387882,0.00003140194,0.9919268,0.001357963,0.003618572,0.002699843,0.00001413317],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00820851,0.000358412,0.9858559,0.00006344031,0.00005712125,0.00008011175,0.00005802836,0.0006669861,0.004651367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3214366,0.001542156,0.6699862,0.00006863278,0.00007498852,0.0004845422,0.0003654928,0.0006298563,0.005411587],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008356718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01661617,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09839953546055487,"score_gpt":0.3906303809629457,"score_spread":0.2922308455023909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}