{"id":"W2146815886","doi":"10.1039/c2em30259d","title":"Screening organic chemicals in commerce for emissions in the context of environmental and human exposure","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Monitoring","topic":"Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Ranking (information retrieval); Organic chemicals; Production (economics); European union; Environmental science; Hazardous waste; False positive paradox; Categorization; Computer science; Biochemical engineering; Engineering; Business; Waste management; Chemistry; Environmental chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001615288,0.0005356593,0.00048827,0.001802986,0.0003545948,0.0009982393,0.0003259942,0.0004402893,0.001095518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001771722,0.0001595981,0.00069223,0.001360568,0.0003001381,0.0005414467,0.0007491804,0.0003218659,0.0003805506],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005630431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007114575,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004455813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01052961,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988396,0.0003116713,0.00003967081,0.0001539397,0.0005935372,0.00006164349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998518,0.0008402877,0.00024143,0.00008682872,0.0002872761,0.00002616012],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008757245,0.0004097668,0.4516188,0.0009409637,0.0004379516,0.001045828,0.0005299766,0.08075655,0.285153,0.002692765,0.00113823,0.1744005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003781342,0.001825232,0.4443155,0.0001681118,0.0004793109,0.001155735,0.001449466,0.1087591,0.4273433,0.004072616,0.01021838,0.0001754817],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.919853,0.001990105,0.06373881,0.0001598392,0.00003388102,0.0003836406,0.002678815,0.0002431773,0.01091868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9525388,0.002623349,0.03990491,0.00006945129,0.00001757744,0.000160237,0.00172066,0.00002344689,0.002941597],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004455813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008859754,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0202336160886344,"score_gpt":0.26734611091331,"score_spread":0.2471124948246756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}