{"id":"W2146976527","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2206.2009.00665.x","title":"Research Review: Economic evidence for interventions in children's social care: revisiting the What Works for Children project","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Child & Family Social Work","topic":"Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Intervention (counseling); Economic evaluation; Psychology; Inclusion (mineral); Cost effectiveness; Medical education; Applied psychology; Public relations; Medicine; Social psychology; Political science; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00624895,0.0002904577,0.0006221671,0.0001608371,0.007471202,0.000155151,0.0008059331,0.0005759836,0.00005911712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001221114,0.0002449675,0.0006413794,0.0009618356,0.0002178299,0.0005284565,0.0002762122,0.003590881,0.00008084023],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004730416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009808905,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000323644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005259463,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951506,0.001407101,0.001167747,0.0006508479,0.0003229878,0.001300681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964014,0.002188964,0.0004843341,0.0003991476,0.0004137935,0.0001123868],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003811334,0.00007395282,0.2789847,0.005670153,0.0001022726,5.795268e-7,0.01826114,8.232752e-7,0.000001655243,0.003121732,0.3167609,0.3766409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001837235,0.00007952856,0.8949402,0.0355074,0.0001613634,0.000001044739,0.0177388,0.000003170313,4.802682e-7,0.0006058933,0.0486066,0.0005182842],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5283021,0.2766621,0.0001743568,0.1490841,0.005631917,0.03878489,0.0004103627,0.0002576178,0.0006924595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8881991,0.05298928,0.0004417986,0.006034347,0.04575795,0.005431452,0.0006890493,0.0001655635,0.0002914584],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6159555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989485,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2604878293272738,"score_gpt":0.5340700039878575,"score_spread":0.2735821746605837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}