{"id":"W2146997491","doi":"10.1017/s0008423903778809","title":"Constituency Homogeneity, Economic Risk and Support for Quebec Sovereignty: A Research Note","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Sovereignty; Voting; Politics; Political economy; Status quo; Political science; Nationalism; Vulnerability (computing); Development economics; Economics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001349581,0.0001631757,0.0003259821,0.001569574,0.003981833,0.002464257,0.0006790157,0.0004934674,0.007803607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006625943,0.0001076258,0.0003652023,0.002297663,0.002345833,0.001219938,0.001418608,0.0008269587,0.0001553921],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01408636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005955878,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9084579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9438668,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990671,0.0002587024,0.00003736382,0.0001397434,0.000228832,0.0002682425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938667,0.002423605,0.001680469,0.0002627923,0.0009035211,0.0008628701],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009314787,0.00005713559,0.9798003,0.00002298333,0.0001003728,0.0002265645,0.006356078,0.00042259,0.0002166782,0.004902756,0.0006226916,0.007178732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008131094,0.00003933967,0.9886072,0.00002765056,0.00003380139,0.00004668473,0.007672398,0.0008088684,0.00008500628,0.0006524558,0.002005877,0.00001269192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866471,0.0002609172,0.0001695979,0.001140042,0.000005197863,0.00001597284,0.0003177693,0.000003010408,0.01144032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992255,0.00003967285,0.00004792585,0.00003955751,0.000003111596,0.000003968903,0.00006523698,6.975111e-7,0.0005743302],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9859136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1841623,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05750782237681246,"score_gpt":0.387577084449475,"score_spread":0.3300692620726626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}