{"id":"W2147080470","doi":"10.1109/taes.2005.1541431","title":"Emitter number estimation from pulse trains using the GIC","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems","topic":"Wireless Signal Modulation Classification","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Estimator; Train; Computer science; Maximum likelihood; Set (abstract data type); Algorithm; Estimation theory; Pulse (music); SIGNAL (programming language); Mathematical optimization; Electronic engineering; Mathematics; Engineering; Statistics; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001234351,0.0008140369,0.001110875,0.002040701,0.0003746454,0.001052863,0.00140946,0.001116304,0.0009577619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004739159,0.0004040207,0.0005179812,0.001628651,0.0008153434,0.001636795,0.001155875,0.001133848,0.000603842],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008116942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001050851,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001150408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001138415,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991743,0.0001857286,0.00004170046,0.0001407148,0.0003932662,0.00006419718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985049,0.0006911284,0.0001862313,0.000189122,0.000370976,0.00005765239],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003872895,0.0001124619,0.002323424,0.0002999768,0.0001283442,0.0002569346,0.0002080716,0.4881572,0.06713461,0.06884947,0.002611986,0.3695303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007273057,0.00003187222,0.0003456945,0.000009342888,0.000009778273,0.00008930853,0.000006751549,0.9840434,0.00732691,0.007319487,0.0007873449,0.00002279706],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004741358,0.0001191764,0.9942822,0.00003314269,0.00001451483,0.00001765597,0.00002905637,0.0001915306,0.0005713429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.223676,0.0003259584,0.773555,0.00009925065,0.00006702711,0.0001194575,0.0003639849,0.0001219641,0.001671405],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002040701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00652796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02102194054419952,"score_gpt":0.2554971476887658,"score_spread":0.2344752071445663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}