{"id":"W2147095510","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0014340","title":"Does Foraging Behaviour Affect Female Mate Preferences and Pair Formation in Captive Zebra Finches?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Foraging; Taeniopygia; Zebra finch; Biology; Juvenile; Ecology; Nest (protein structural motif); Zoology; Flock; Animal sexual behaviour; Demography; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000156538,0.0002555138,0.0002111357,0.0002379302,0.0003421941,0.0003024066,0.0002374414,0.0004911316,0.00204779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005507452,0.0001324968,0.0001136738,0.00007861933,0.0005462965,0.0001769519,0.0001840324,0.00032835,0.0002000371],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003165757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001263949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004324731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01705878,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999055,0.00002371629,0.000004097547,0.00003579796,0.000008401144,0.00002264475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996535,0.00007288733,0.0001260866,0.00002636835,0.00002233338,0.00009887044],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001743642,0.0008347324,0.853944,0.0001059657,0.0001236953,0.0005074868,0.000820497,0.0002283322,0.1323,0.00004428757,0.0004249011,0.008922441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004315315,0.0002806139,0.9989668,0.000002605926,0.000008263826,0.00004911853,0.00009539808,0.00007818056,0.0004622769,0.000007424535,0.00004250879,0.000002430073],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998047,0.00003539299,0.00001310323,0.00001272819,0.000001714127,0.000001971782,0.00002677792,0.00000165606,0.000102053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995236,0.00003030085,0.0000630682,0.0000336296,0.000002139637,0.000009572141,0.00007294184,0.000001762705,0.0002629203],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004324731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008599102,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04694542728748893,"score_gpt":0.2238683633688552,"score_spread":0.1769229360813662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}