{"id":"W2147142297","doi":"10.1093/forestry/cpt022","title":"Prediction of tree-size distributions and inventory variables from cumulants of canopy height distributions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Norges Miljø- og Biovitenskapelige Universitet; Target ALS","keywords":"Cumulant; Mathematics; Decile; Statistics; Forest inventory; Canopy; Probability density function; Probability distribution; Edgeworth series; Statistical inference; Geography; Forestry; Forest management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005069313,0.00008791052,0.0001594334,0.0001041485,0.0001291708,0.00005000039,0.0004639237,0.00008366547,0.0005578473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003921975,0.00007502016,0.00007043598,0.0002246875,0.0005978826,0.0005063273,0.0001459401,0.0002964785,0.00001493158],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001711886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008991406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004419255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000199905,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981487,0.0001308329,0.0005074838,0.0001597869,0.0008631716,0.0001899939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986273,0.0002778043,0.0002776746,0.0002184435,0.0004109609,0.0001878077],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007694774,0.0004277707,0.9721599,0.00000765118,0.0001136329,0.000006623584,0.0002374408,0.0005667965,0.01632288,0.004428282,0.002772938,0.002879166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003906975,0.0001776148,0.9635965,0.00007565899,0.00001628644,0.00003699312,0.00012848,0.00386873,0.004381192,0.02585418,0.001418867,0.0000547817],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942008,0.00003321594,0.003134583,0.0003545238,0.0001284238,0.0001362251,0.0005678865,0.000005520134,0.001438862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973238,0.00008842214,0.002154358,0.000004481715,0.0001531269,0.000004167224,0.000154232,0.000007200547,0.0001102071],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0214259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6680621,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03855426597631722,"score_gpt":0.3140146255188383,"score_spread":0.2754603595425211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}