{"id":"W2147181211","doi":"10.1504/ijesd.2002.000731","title":"Designing emissions trading programs in Canada: the implications of market power on economic and environmental outcomes","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Emissions trading; Market power; Kyoto Protocol; Constraint (computer-aided design); Environmental economics; Industrial organization; Business; Marginal cost; Economics; Market share; Environmental policy; Natural resource economics; Microeconomics; Greenhouse gas; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003590816,0.00009239374,0.000189568,0.0001452632,0.00007086851,0.00002952233,0.000156645,0.00002443596,0.0005051915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001595785,0.00008150387,0.00003111552,0.00001558305,0.00004124709,0.0001165885,0.00007370108,0.00008750587,0.000002716534],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001110762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003870829,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004055202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001708402,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990921,0.000009604992,0.0005612736,0.0001187855,0.00004328147,0.000174936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994555,0.00007798897,0.000336578,0.00006800453,0.000003835193,0.00005812524],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002380271,0.0001147435,0.985181,0.000008859836,0.0001302993,0.00001732948,0.002837498,0.0002056356,0.00001218431,0.007075115,0.0004925431,0.003900968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008643998,0.00005978118,0.9537516,0.00002997215,0.000005791974,0.00003561693,0.009305846,0.0009339851,0.00008459752,0.003254698,0.03147649,0.0001972107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942282,0.0005580616,0.00008424323,0.002835197,0.00008200931,0.0001142128,0.00002179561,8.60489e-7,0.002075381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979621,0.001086287,0.0003125048,0.0001501093,0.00001503133,0.00001002584,0.000003323753,0.000007302458,0.0004533439],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03142941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.613028,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04386325601961221,"score_gpt":0.2076498411184119,"score_spread":0.1637865850987997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}