{"id":"W2147206176","doi":"10.2165/00019053-200624040-00008","title":"A Cost-Utility Analysis of Losartan versus Atenolol in the Treatment of??Hypertension with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PharmacoEconomics","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada); BC Centre for Disease Control; University of British Columbia; Peace Arch Hospital; Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes","funders":"","keywords":"Atenolol; Losartan; Medicine; Left ventricular hypertrophy; Cardiology; Myocardial infarction; Internal medicine; Cost effectiveness; Stroke (engine); Angiotensin II; Blood pressure","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009571398,0.001677037,0.003167272,0.002295141,0.0003932703,0.002311097,0.001507806,0.0017567,0.005189383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0274215,0.0008307224,0.003564878,0.001814054,0.001080316,0.001651903,0.001144202,0.002167714,0.0002043007],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005390652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00199067,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01285052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006078519,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9914694,0.007499704,0.0001887641,0.0002189768,0.0002861037,0.0003369457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776412,0.02031294,0.0007253916,0.0002454135,0.0004237719,0.0006513785],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.266748,0.003615135,0.03090347,0.003224703,0.0166245,0.001177995,0.0002794855,0.578138,0.002159678,0.01307377,0.004467256,0.07958811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0278444,0.01671298,0.03188923,0.0005278733,0.02300319,0.000837967,0.0006477494,0.8851664,0.0009519566,0.01003325,0.002131167,0.0002537685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9507477,0.01793223,0.0172528,0.004351899,0.0002639449,0.0008493005,0.002340203,0.0001161508,0.00614578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965521,0.0008616714,0.001486042,0.0001900213,0.00005317235,0.00008679448,0.0002803228,0.000007246499,0.0004825616],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01285052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05061901,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3554939530175164,"score_gpt":0.4213684518842549,"score_spread":0.06587449886673846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}