{"id":"W2147227737","doi":"10.3968/j.est.1923847920120401.456","title":"Assessing the Contribution of Carbon Emissions Trading in China to Carbon Intensity Reduction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Energy science and technology","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computable general equilibrium; Allowance (engineering); China; Greenhouse gas; Emissions trading; Agricultural economics; Rest (music); Ton; Carbon fibers; Natural resource economics; Environmental science; Economics; Business; Geography; Mathematics; Operations management; Macroeconomics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00168969,0.0008038009,0.0005975968,0.000544813,0.0004288208,0.00119325,0.0008257279,0.0009753383,0.001242524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003857541,0.0003691435,0.0007905512,0.000565172,0.00065941,0.001350334,0.001108101,0.0007624839,0.00006770895],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002865628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002966777,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1166531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07031452,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994199,0.0002499885,0.00001807072,0.00006649652,0.00009700889,0.000148465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987993,0.000673409,0.0001969771,0.0000604743,0.0001820702,0.00008785116],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000139309,0.00004726791,0.02617756,0.00005161232,0.0001090786,0.0002454002,0.00003949698,0.9651212,0.0007327822,0.003616516,0.0002927073,0.003427069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004702014,0.0001147965,0.01339205,0.000006749899,0.00008862279,0.00002857728,0.00009247119,0.9824274,0.0005570938,0.002708883,0.0005119357,0.00002441766],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903316,0.0003554165,0.00448959,0.0005233755,0.00002289835,0.00002898097,0.0001867981,0.00004870565,0.004012643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987424,0.0001525317,0.0004471455,0.00002747447,0.000005137033,0.000006362778,0.00007803667,0.000005169637,0.0005357782],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1166531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2319482,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04617966624672464,"score_gpt":0.2728582601762635,"score_spread":0.2266785939295388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}