{"id":"W2147237603","doi":"10.1139/x08-120","title":"Optimal on- and off-site forest carbon sequestration under existing timber supply constraints in northern New Brunswick","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Forest management; Environmental science; Forest inventory; Forestry; Softwood; Agroforestry; Geography; Ecology; Botany; Carbon dioxide; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007639957,0.0001278038,0.0001542941,0.0004264116,0.0002161652,0.00007909106,0.0002468235,0.00008084562,0.0005714617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001463981,0.0001196503,0.00003889103,0.0004023511,0.000811033,0.000228319,0.00004277339,0.0005209477,0.000155363],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005214162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001366468,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2267398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9338787,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982938,0.0001069231,0.0003028194,0.0001877044,0.00048429,0.0006244786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998851,0.0001004914,0.00008495744,0.000152597,0.00004172645,0.0007692329],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002617822,0.00001152714,0.9715387,0.000004668678,0.000007231329,0.0005609865,0.0007340244,0.02224225,0.00001367428,0.0009541525,0.002695968,0.001210597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005572077,0.0002674668,0.993084,0.0000643901,0.000003595044,0.0001873584,0.00007424087,0.001399139,0.000008672489,0.0005460198,0.00368462,0.0001232698],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9621647,0.00007582935,0.000007029106,0.001020262,0.00005117509,0.0001735848,0.000002303422,0.000003122976,0.03650197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958474,0.00004389361,0.000243221,0.00008968619,0.0001558043,0.00000120358,0.000004893255,0.00001717072,0.003596697],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7071388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7784094,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05934422839323351,"score_gpt":0.3040309855721667,"score_spread":0.2446867571789332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}