{"id":"W2147237603","doi":"10.1139/x08-120","title":"Optimal on- and off-site forest carbon sequestration under existing timber supply constraints in northern New Brunswick","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Forest management; Environmental science; Forest inventory; Forestry; Softwood; Agroforestry; Geography; Ecology; Botany; Carbon dioxide; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005108275,0.0004759221,0.0005601174,0.0005031101,0.000703384,0.001294339,0.001102887,0.0004976193,0.002330044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007691896,0.000515905,0.000458919,0.000841444,0.0005230859,0.0004945729,0.0005184401,0.0003807777,0.0001296065],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01499171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01293548,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8788741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9495648,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997802,0.00003088143,0.000004884008,0.00002671963,0.00002018574,0.0001371814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998165,0.00005397885,0.00001914491,0.000008375471,0.00006478031,0.00003722604],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001329483,0.00005292344,0.01533557,0.00005828578,0.00004346701,0.000370081,0.00007658453,0.9684759,0.002830981,0.002804287,0.000738999,0.009079936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002647187,0.0001907468,0.02620031,0.00006320916,0.0001226248,0.00009810485,0.0009519014,0.9574686,0.005538449,0.004608807,0.004414624,0.00007785299],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9777637,0.0002494441,0.005986019,0.0002531444,0.00001457973,0.0001655317,0.0009749542,0.0000516511,0.01454098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894722,0.0001753696,0.006269549,0.00006284771,0.000001947122,0.00007371119,0.0005772307,0.00002174954,0.003345319],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1211259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2436785,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05934422839323351,"score_gpt":0.3040309855721667,"score_spread":0.2446867571789332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}