{"id":"W2147480862","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2012.05.002","title":"Risk interpretation and action: A conceptual framework for responses to natural hazards","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":593,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"International Social Science Council","keywords":"Action (physics); Context (archaeology); Natural hazard; Interpretation (philosophy); Interpersonal communication; Natural (archaeology); Conceptual model; Risk analysis (engineering); Conceptual framework; Moderation; Social psychology; Psychology; Management science; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009400947,0.00009168571,0.0001172415,0.0002190384,0.0002120473,0.000177445,0.0002384524,0.00005941166,0.00004538655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001258825,0.00007897319,0.00009898823,0.0001164909,0.0002033945,0.001236747,0.00004449245,0.0001996286,0.000009504723],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001330033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004922603,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005917489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003160406,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986251,0.0002451926,0.0003052743,0.0001184916,0.0005189427,0.000187017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987376,0.0002257393,0.0004498639,0.0000633168,0.0003853175,0.0001381454],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004021888,0.0002585698,0.03724235,0.00001192121,0.0004728014,0.000002282168,0.2499474,0.0001564489,0.0005894129,0.03382526,0.005307878,0.6681638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002742693,0.001100145,0.1451889,0.0006377106,0.0006112503,0.0001737353,0.5457319,0.0006697259,0.001338157,0.04297847,0.2579494,0.0008779112],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9314989,0.0003167644,0.05738667,0.001747302,0.008402376,0.0002006923,0.00001667689,0.00001474353,0.0004159123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892047,0.0002967036,0.00653187,0.00008167211,0.002995542,0.000009796247,0.000002262943,0.00000822457,0.0008692463],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6672859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3220433,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02546023317836394,"score_gpt":0.3745355137050078,"score_spread":0.3490752805266438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}