{"id":"W2147480862","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2012.05.002","title":"Risk interpretation and action: A conceptual framework for responses to natural hazards","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":593,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"International Social Science Council","keywords":"Action (physics); Context (archaeology); Natural hazard; Interpretation (philosophy); Interpersonal communication; Natural (archaeology); Conceptual model; Risk analysis (engineering); Conceptual framework; Moderation; Social psychology; Psychology; Management science; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02453053,0.002556457,0.001472037,0.006714232,0.007017255,0.01622466,0.006208428,0.01083785,0.005927786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01470777,0.0008390837,0.00214749,0.004449531,0.06211089,0.02042781,0.009093516,0.007687953,0.00106657],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009784491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009722786,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008475508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004771356,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9762599,0.01789589,0.001116193,0.00170594,0.001965256,0.00105672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858845,0.009251816,0.001967855,0.0006361109,0.001179008,0.001080722],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001290813,0.00002135985,0.0003819895,0.000226993,0.00001682556,0.0001615357,0.02986318,0.001300957,0.0001416294,0.9621413,0.0009281473,0.004803261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001852525,0.00005326048,0.0004463617,0.0006149026,0.00002395499,0.0002734539,0.02572141,0.003139237,0.00009600545,0.920565,0.04899839,0.00004950201],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0265702,0.01743875,0.6086076,0.1108861,0.00133091,0.001173688,0.0003894441,0.0003885814,0.2332148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7645737,0.008865091,0.2081851,0.00640412,0.0005653066,0.002481797,0.000309529,0.0001881487,0.008427299],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02453053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1297314,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02546023317836394,"score_gpt":0.3745355137050078,"score_spread":0.3490752805266438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}